Talk:Microeconomics/Draft: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Nick Gardner
(suggestions for changes to the opening paragraph)
imported>Martin Baldwin-Edwards
No edit summary
Line 19: Line 19:


[[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 04:26, 14 September 2007 (CDT)
[[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 04:26, 14 September 2007 (CDT)
:This sounds fine, so go ahead. Nothing will be set in stone anyway, so don't worry about changing things on the wiki. The previous author left in a huff: for the moment you are on your own with this article. Good luck! --[[User:Martin Baldwin-Edwards|Martin Baldwin-Edwards]] 07:32, 14 September 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 06:32, 14 September 2007


Article Checklist for "Microeconomics/Draft"
Workgroup category or categories Economics Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? No
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by J. R. Campos 13:25, 1 April 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





I suggest replacing the opening paragraph with a more conventional definition including the familiar concepts of the alternative uses of limited resources and the consequences of economic efficiency for the welfare of the community. The paragraph could then include links to separate articles on competition and on economic efficiency. (My apologies for the existing competition link - that will have to be moved in any case)

The references to economic agents and models could be retained, but might better be preceded by a sentence or so explaining the concept of a model (I have found that the term is not always well understood by non-economists)

Should there also be something in the opening paragraph about positive and normative economics?

I will not attempt any drafting until I have your reaction to my suggestions.

Nick Gardner 04:26, 14 September 2007 (CDT)

This sounds fine, so go ahead. Nothing will be set in stone anyway, so don't worry about changing things on the wiki. The previous author left in a huff: for the moment you are on your own with this article. Good luck! --Martin Baldwin-Edwards 07:32, 14 September 2007 (CDT)