CZ Talk:We aren't Wikipedia: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger
No edit summary
imported>Chris day
(certainly don't ignore the difference.)
Line 2: Line 2:


Of course we won't be able to say this forever.  When we have our first vandalism outside of that self-registration period, we can change this to read, "We have had virtually no vandalism."  Vandalism isn't much of a challenge, first of all; and it's not a challenge for us to shut down.  But it's really important that we include this in a list of differences--it's one of the biggest (and most positive) differences between the projects. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 00:27, 21 March 2007 (CDT)
Of course we won't be able to say this forever.  When we have our first vandalism outside of that self-registration period, we can change this to read, "We have had virtually no vandalism."  Vandalism isn't much of a challenge, first of all; and it's not a challenge for us to shut down.  But it's really important that we include this in a list of differences--it's one of the biggest (and most positive) differences between the projects. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 00:27, 21 March 2007 (CDT)
:Certainly from the perspective of a serious editor, low levels of  vandalism is a huge attraction to edit here rather than wikipedia.  In my mind that, along with the protected, approved pages, are the two most important distinctions. [[User:Chris day|Chris Day]] [[User talk:Chris day|(Talk)]] 00:41, 21 March 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 23:41, 20 March 2007

Larry, do you think that number four might be regarded as a challenge? I'd say ignore them. Chris Day (Talk) 23:38, 20 March 2007 (CDT)

Of course we won't be able to say this forever. When we have our first vandalism outside of that self-registration period, we can change this to read, "We have had virtually no vandalism." Vandalism isn't much of a challenge, first of all; and it's not a challenge for us to shut down. But it's really important that we include this in a list of differences--it's one of the biggest (and most positive) differences between the projects. --Larry Sanger 00:27, 21 March 2007 (CDT)

Certainly from the perspective of a serious editor, low levels of vandalism is a huge attraction to edit here rather than wikipedia. In my mind that, along with the protected, approved pages, are the two most important distinctions. Chris Day (Talk) 00:41, 21 March 2007 (CDT)