Talk:Asperger's syndrome: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Brandon Zubek (?) |
imported>Minhaj Ahmed Khan Lodi |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
::The term 'sufferer' has been discussed and I decided (as it is an Eduzendium article) that I wouldn't be changing it. Is there a Conflict of Interest clause on CZ? [[User:Brandon Zubek|Brandon Zubek]] 06:04, 8 May 2008 (CDT) | ::The term 'sufferer' has been discussed and I decided (as it is an Eduzendium article) that I wouldn't be changing it. Is there a Conflict of Interest clause on CZ? [[User:Brandon Zubek|Brandon Zubek]] 06:04, 8 May 2008 (CDT) | ||
: Citizendium's [[CZ:Neutrality Policy|Neutrality policy]] states that articles should be unbiased and neutral, accepting all points of view. [[User:Minhaj Ahmed Khan Lodi|Minhaj Ahmed Khan Lodi]] 14:41, 17 May 2008 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 13:41, 17 May 2008
Duplicate article
Why do we have this and Asperger syndrome? I'm not sure which is the more common name, I've heard the "'s" variant more, but maybe that's just me. You all are going to have to merge these two articles, and figure out which name you want the article at. J. Noel Chiappa 10:33, 2 April 2008 (CDT)
- My thoughts exactly. I think the Asperger syndrome article is quite well developed. Plus, I don't like the term "sufferer", it's demeaning. Minhaj Ahmed Khan Lodi 15:35, 2 April 2008 (CDT)
- The term 'sufferer' has been discussed and I decided (as it is an Eduzendium article) that I wouldn't be changing it. Is there a Conflict of Interest clause on CZ? Brandon Zubek 06:04, 8 May 2008 (CDT)
- Citizendium's Neutrality policy states that articles should be unbiased and neutral, accepting all points of view. Minhaj Ahmed Khan Lodi 14:41, 17 May 2008 (CDT)