Talk:Asperger's syndrome: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Howard Arvi Hughes
m (checklist)
imported>Jacob Jensen
No edit summary
Line 14: Line 14:


Imported this from WP. It has received a fairly high rating, bronze star  or something like that. However, it does need paring down and many of the sources remain to be checked out. Meanwhile, I would like some help on the info box in the upper right hand corner. At this time, I have made quite a few small changes and rewrites. I will put it on CZ:Live status today. Let me know if you think this is jumping the gun. [[User:Thomas Simmons|Thomas Simmons]] 12:21, 21 March, 2007 (EPT)
Imported this from WP. It has received a fairly high rating, bronze star  or something like that. However, it does need paring down and many of the sources remain to be checked out. Meanwhile, I would like some help on the info box in the upper right hand corner. At this time, I have made quite a few small changes and rewrites. I will put it on CZ:Live status today. Let me know if you think this is jumping the gun. [[User:Thomas Simmons|Thomas Simmons]] 12:21, 21 March, 2007 (EPT)
:: One hope I have for this article is that it can ultimately lose the undue emphasis on "controversy" and "criticism" that seem so common in wikipedia articles.  For example, the section which is titled "History" includes summaries of disputes over diagnostic criteria and whether AS and HFA should be differentiated.  These sorts of things certainly need to be discussed somewhere in the article but I don't think that the reader needs a constant reminder of the controversy.
:: I have a small library of (reputable) books on Asperger's and autism and am going on nine years of raising an Aspie.  I'd be happy to help improve and "Citizendifying" this article.  [[User:Jacob Jensen|Jacob Jensen]] 12:38, 5 April 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 11:38, 5 April 2007


Article Checklist for "Asperger's syndrome"
Workgroup category or categories Health Sciences Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? No
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by -Versuri 07:47, 23 March 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





G'day,

Imported this from WP. It has received a fairly high rating, bronze star or something like that. However, it does need paring down and many of the sources remain to be checked out. Meanwhile, I would like some help on the info box in the upper right hand corner. At this time, I have made quite a few small changes and rewrites. I will put it on CZ:Live status today. Let me know if you think this is jumping the gun. Thomas Simmons 12:21, 21 March, 2007 (EPT)

One hope I have for this article is that it can ultimately lose the undue emphasis on "controversy" and "criticism" that seem so common in wikipedia articles. For example, the section which is titled "History" includes summaries of disputes over diagnostic criteria and whether AS and HFA should be differentiated. These sorts of things certainly need to be discussed somewhere in the article but I don't think that the reader needs a constant reminder of the controversy.
I have a small library of (reputable) books on Asperger's and autism and am going on nine years of raising an Aspie. I'd be happy to help improve and "Citizendifying" this article. Jacob Jensen 12:38, 5 April 2007 (CDT)