Talk:Asperger's syndrome: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Howard Arvi Hughes m (checklist) |
imported>Jacob Jensen No edit summary |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
Imported this from WP. It has received a fairly high rating, bronze star or something like that. However, it does need paring down and many of the sources remain to be checked out. Meanwhile, I would like some help on the info box in the upper right hand corner. At this time, I have made quite a few small changes and rewrites. I will put it on CZ:Live status today. Let me know if you think this is jumping the gun. [[User:Thomas Simmons|Thomas Simmons]] 12:21, 21 March, 2007 (EPT) | Imported this from WP. It has received a fairly high rating, bronze star or something like that. However, it does need paring down and many of the sources remain to be checked out. Meanwhile, I would like some help on the info box in the upper right hand corner. At this time, I have made quite a few small changes and rewrites. I will put it on CZ:Live status today. Let me know if you think this is jumping the gun. [[User:Thomas Simmons|Thomas Simmons]] 12:21, 21 March, 2007 (EPT) | ||
:: One hope I have for this article is that it can ultimately lose the undue emphasis on "controversy" and "criticism" that seem so common in wikipedia articles. For example, the section which is titled "History" includes summaries of disputes over diagnostic criteria and whether AS and HFA should be differentiated. These sorts of things certainly need to be discussed somewhere in the article but I don't think that the reader needs a constant reminder of the controversy. | |||
:: I have a small library of (reputable) books on Asperger's and autism and am going on nine years of raising an Aspie. I'd be happy to help improve and "Citizendifying" this article. [[User:Jacob Jensen|Jacob Jensen]] 12:38, 5 April 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 11:38, 5 April 2007
Workgroup category or categories | Health Sciences Workgroup [Categories OK] |
Article status | Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete |
Underlinked article? | No |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | -Versuri 07:47, 23 March 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
G'day,
Imported this from WP. It has received a fairly high rating, bronze star or something like that. However, it does need paring down and many of the sources remain to be checked out. Meanwhile, I would like some help on the info box in the upper right hand corner. At this time, I have made quite a few small changes and rewrites. I will put it on CZ:Live status today. Let me know if you think this is jumping the gun. Thomas Simmons 12:21, 21 March, 2007 (EPT)
- One hope I have for this article is that it can ultimately lose the undue emphasis on "controversy" and "criticism" that seem so common in wikipedia articles. For example, the section which is titled "History" includes summaries of disputes over diagnostic criteria and whether AS and HFA should be differentiated. These sorts of things certainly need to be discussed somewhere in the article but I don't think that the reader needs a constant reminder of the controversy.
- I have a small library of (reputable) books on Asperger's and autism and am going on nine years of raising an Aspie. I'd be happy to help improve and "Citizendifying" this article. Jacob Jensen 12:38, 5 April 2007 (CDT)
Categories:
- Health Sciences Category Check
- General Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Health Sciences Advanced Articles
- Health Sciences Nonstub Articles
- Health Sciences Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Health Sciences Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Health Sciences Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Health Sciences Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Health Sciences External Articles
- Health Sciences Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Health Sciences Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Cleanup