Talk:Singapore English: Difference between revisions
imported>Anonymous m (Talk:Singapore English moved to Talk:May I Kiss Larry\'s Dong?) |
imported>David Tribe m (Protected "Talk:Singapore English": MOVE locked [move=sysop]) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Also, I don't want to sound like a crusty old fuddy-duddy, but if you examine the talk page and logs for the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singlish Wikipedia version] of this page, you'll find that it was mostly written by a 17-year-old who hasn't studied the subject as yet in a higher education institution. Now, don't get me wrong; in many ways it's a nice page, and more power to him for spreading knowledge. But there really is very little evidence for the creolist view. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 00:08, 14 February 2007 (CST) | Also, I don't want to sound like a crusty old fuddy-duddy, but if you examine the talk page and logs for the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singlish Wikipedia version] of this page, you'll find that it was mostly written by a 17-year-old who hasn't studied the subject as yet in a higher education institution. Now, don't get me wrong; in many ways it's a nice page, and more power to him for spreading knowledge. But there really is very little evidence for the creolist view. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 00:08, 14 February 2007 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 02:32, 14 February 2007
SCE as a creole
I have discussed this issue with Anthea Fraser Gupta, a leading expert in creole languages and particularly Singapore Colloquial English. She tells me that there is little evidence that SCE is a creole; rather it's a mixed variety. It never went through a proper pidgin stage. I also contacted Mark Sebba, another well-known creolist, and he didn't support the creole view either. So in the long term I intend to move this page away from making the claim, as found throughout much of the Internet, that SCE is a creole.
Also, I don't want to sound like a crusty old fuddy-duddy, but if you examine the talk page and logs for the Wikipedia version of this page, you'll find that it was mostly written by a 17-year-old who hasn't studied the subject as yet in a higher education institution. Now, don't get me wrong; in many ways it's a nice page, and more power to him for spreading knowledge. But there really is very little evidence for the creolist view. John Stephenson 00:08, 14 February 2007 (CST)