Talk:Taj Mahal: Difference between revisions
imported>Russ McGinn (voice concerns re article) |
imported>Russ McGinn (comment) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
There are significant problems with this article at the moment which I am trying to resolve on wikipedia - essentially, the theories of P.N. Oak are fringe theories given undue prominence within the article (some of the assertions aren't just confined to the P.N. Oak section), although they are increasingly believed as fact in India where the denial of Islamic prominence in their architectural history is finding resonance as political tensions become more strained with Pakistan. I'm rewriting the wikipedia article under my sock joopercoopers and hope to have it completed in a month or so - I'll post it here then. --[[User:Russ McGinn|Russ McGinn]] 18:30, 29 January 2007 (CST) | There are significant problems with this article at the moment which I am trying to resolve on wikipedia - essentially, the theories of P.N. Oak are fringe theories given undue prominence within the article (some of the assertions aren't just confined to the P.N. Oak section), although they are increasingly believed as fact in India where the denial of Islamic prominence in their architectural history is finding resonance as political tensions become more strained with Pakistan. I'm rewriting the wikipedia article under my sock joopercoopers and hope to have it completed in a month or so - I'll post it here then. --[[User:Russ McGinn|Russ McGinn]] 18:30, 29 January 2007 (CST) | ||
mmmm. well I didn't finish it there - I'm bringing it over here to work on it. - Or is the form to work on articles in user subpages and then post to mainspace. --[[User:Russ McGinn|Russ McGinn]] 08:52, 25 June 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 07:52, 25 June 2007
There are significant problems with this article at the moment which I am trying to resolve on wikipedia - essentially, the theories of P.N. Oak are fringe theories given undue prominence within the article (some of the assertions aren't just confined to the P.N. Oak section), although they are increasingly believed as fact in India where the denial of Islamic prominence in their architectural history is finding resonance as political tensions become more strained with Pakistan. I'm rewriting the wikipedia article under my sock joopercoopers and hope to have it completed in a month or so - I'll post it here then. --Russ McGinn 18:30, 29 January 2007 (CST)
mmmm. well I didn't finish it there - I'm bringing it over here to work on it. - Or is the form to work on articles in user subpages and then post to mainspace. --Russ McGinn 08:52, 25 June 2007 (CDT)