Talk:Evolution of cells: Difference between revisions
imported>Luke Brandt (article checklist (no cleanup was necessary)) |
imported>Anthony.Sebastian (Darwin considered community origin) |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
really wonderful. [[User:Nancy Sculerati MD|Nancy Sculerati MD]] 01:49, 5 February 2007 (CST) | really wonderful. [[User:Nancy Sculerati MD|Nancy Sculerati MD]] 01:49, 5 February 2007 (CST) | ||
== Darwin considered community origin == | |||
The last line of Darwin's ''on the Origin of Species'' (1st edition) reads: | |||
<blockquote>There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, having been originally breathed into a few forms or into one; and that, whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been, and are being, evolved.</blockquote> | |||
'"..originally breathed into a few forms or one..." | |||
--[[User:Anthony.Sebastian|Anthony.Sebastian]] [[User talk:Anthony.Sebastian|(Talk)]] 21:10, 12 April 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 20:10, 12 April 2007
Workgroup category or categories | Biology Workgroup [Categories OK] |
Article status | Developed article: complete or nearly so |
Underlinked article? | No |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | luke 00:26, 20 March 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
Life
An early question that needs to be confronted, indeed a question that in the last analysis requires definition, is: What is life? Most biologists would agree that self-replication, genetic continuity, is a fundamental trait of the life process. Systems that generally would be deemed nonbiological can exhibit a sort of self-replication, however. Examples would be the growth of a crystal lattice or a propagating clay structure. Crystals and clays propagate, unquestionably, but life they are not. There is no locus of genetic continuity, no organism. Such systems do not evolve, do not change in genetic ways to meet new challenges. Consequently, the definition of life should include the capacity for evolution as well as self-replication. Indeed, the mechanism of evolution---natural selection---is a consequence of the necessarily competing drives for self-replication that are manifest in all organisms. The definition based on those processes, then, would be that life is any self-replicating, evolving system (Norman R Pace 2001).[1]
really wonderful. Nancy Sculerati MD 01:49, 5 February 2007 (CST)
Darwin considered community origin
The last line of Darwin's on the Origin of Species (1st edition) reads:
There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, having been originally breathed into a few forms or into one; and that, whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been, and are being, evolved.
'"..originally breathed into a few forms or one..."
--Anthony.Sebastian (Talk) 21:10, 12 April 2007 (CDT)
- ↑ http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/98/3/805 The universal nature of biochemistry
- Biology Category Check
- General Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Biology Advanced Articles
- Biology Nonstub Articles
- Biology Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Biology Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Biology Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Biology Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Biology External Articles
- Biology Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Biology Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Cleanup