Talk:Galaxy (astronomy): Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>David Martin
No edit summary
imported>Subpagination Bot
m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details))
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
What do people think about the structure of this article? First of all, I think "Galactic Biology" has to go. Because, what? It just seems way out of place (space or place?). -- [[User:Sarah Tuttle|Sarah Tuttle]] 10:24, 5 January 2007 (CST)
What do people think about the structure of this article? First of all, I think "Galactic Biology" has to go. Because, what? It just seems way out of place (space or place?). -- [[User:Sarah Tuttle|Sarah Tuttle]] 10:24, 5 January 2007 (CST)


Line 18: Line 20:


As a non native speaker I'm trying to do additional kind of work instead of contributing text. I started to load up a few images from Hubble Gallery and integrated them in the article. However, I'm not really sure if they are really ideal that way. A real good graphic for "galaxy" would be [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Hubble_sequence_photo.png  the hubble sequence photo] from Commons. It's GNU and produced by Ville Koisten. But I'll have to look for the right way of proceeding before loading up non public domain graphics. So long --[[User:Sebastian Breitschafter|Sebastian Breitschafter]] 19:07, 23 February 2007 (CST)
As a non native speaker I'm trying to do additional kind of work instead of contributing text. I started to load up a few images from Hubble Gallery and integrated them in the article. However, I'm not really sure if they are really ideal that way. A real good graphic for "galaxy" would be [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Hubble_sequence_photo.png  the hubble sequence photo] from Commons. It's GNU and produced by Ville Koisten. But I'll have to look for the right way of proceeding before loading up non public domain graphics. So long --[[User:Sebastian Breitschafter|Sebastian Breitschafter]] 19:07, 23 February 2007 (CST)
{{checklist
|                abc = Galaxy
|                cat1 = Astronomy
|                cat2 =
|                cat3 =
|          cat_check = Y
|              status = 1
|        underlinked = N
|            cleanup = Y
|                  by = [[User:David Martin|David Martin]] 21:08, 2 April 2007 (CDT)
}}

Revision as of 12:35, 26 September 2007

This article is developed but not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  Gravitationally bound system of stars typically contain ten million to one trillion stars. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category:  Astronomy [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  British English

What do people think about the structure of this article? First of all, I think "Galactic Biology" has to go. Because, what? It just seems way out of place (space or place?). -- Sarah Tuttle 10:24, 5 January 2007 (CST)

Re-write proposal

Hey James. We should throw this article up to CZ live. Also, what do you think about a complete rewrite? Sarah Tuttle 10:46, 12 February 2007 (CST)

I added the CZ Live category. removed the "galactic biology" section (it was misplaced) and put a link to Extraterrestrial life article in the See also section.
As for re-writing: sorry, right at the moment I can't help there. My plate is full for the time being with Joan of Arc related pages and I need to bring some of them to a conclusion or at least get them further along before adding more. It probably wouldn't be this one anyway. If I work on any Astronomy articles, they would most likely be 19th century and earlier. James F. Perry 12:57, 16 February 2007 (CST)

help

hi all, ermmmm you got me here. What do you mean by galaxy, milky way, M31, NGC 531 or Universe, all of them????? Robert Tito | Talk 13:09, 16 February 2007 (CST)

Pictures and graphics

As a non native speaker I'm trying to do additional kind of work instead of contributing text. I started to load up a few images from Hubble Gallery and integrated them in the article. However, I'm not really sure if they are really ideal that way. A real good graphic for "galaxy" would be the hubble sequence photo from Commons. It's GNU and produced by Ville Koisten. But I'll have to look for the right way of proceeding before loading up non public domain graphics. So long --Sebastian Breitschafter 19:07, 23 February 2007 (CST)

Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Galaxy_(astronomy)&oldid=117523"