Talk:Supernova: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Tomas Kindahl
imported>Tomas Kindahl
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
==Split of from [[Nova (astronomy)]]==
==Split of from [[Nova (astronomy)]]==
Because currently considered unrelated to novae. Done today 19 July 2010. [[User:Tomas Kindahl|Tomas Kindahl]] 10:30, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
Because currently considered unrelated to novae. Done today 19 July 2010. [[User:Tomas Kindahl|Tomas Kindahl]] 10:30, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
== Diagram about nuclear binding energy ==
I added a diagram and chose to center it and interrupt the text flow. I think this is appropriate because the diagram is not a 'comment' but rather a vital part of the text. I realise that you may disagree, however. [[User:Johan A. Förberg|Johan A. Förberg]] 13:45, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
:I agree. I think it supports the article. I copied the text constituting the section '''Physical aspects''' from the article [[Nova (astronomy)]] and simply added the intro out of my mind, so the article needs some more proofreading to see if it is coherent and non-contradictory. [[User:Tomas Kindahl|Tomas Kindahl]] 20:04, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 14:04, 19 July 2010

This article is developing and not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  An astronomical object exploding to a brightness similar to that of an entire galaxy. Caused by a catastrophic explosion of either a white dwarf system or an aged star about five times the size of the sun, which occurs when the star collapses; a neutron star or a black hole may be formed as a result, or the explosion results in no remaining compact object. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category:  Astronomy [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  American English

Split of from Nova (astronomy)

Because currently considered unrelated to novae. Done today 19 July 2010. Tomas Kindahl 10:30, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Diagram about nuclear binding energy

I added a diagram and chose to center it and interrupt the text flow. I think this is appropriate because the diagram is not a 'comment' but rather a vital part of the text. I realise that you may disagree, however. Johan A. Förberg 13:45, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

I agree. I think it supports the article. I copied the text constituting the section Physical aspects from the article Nova (astronomy) and simply added the intro out of my mind, so the article needs some more proofreading to see if it is coherent and non-contradictory. Tomas Kindahl 20:04, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Supernova&oldid=744286"