Rocket science: Difference between revisions
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz |
mNo edit summary |
||
(12 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
{{TOC | {{TOC|right}} | ||
'''Rocket science''' is an everyday term for [[astronautics]], or astronautical engineering, the branch of engineering that deals with vehicles that travel in whole or in part through [[outer space]]. It is compared and contrasted with ''aeronautics'', the field that covers vehicles travelling within the [[Earth's atmosphere]]. There are naturally overlapping areas within the two disciplines, so the modern tendency is to combine the two as [[aerospace engineering]]. | |||
'''Rocket science''' is an everyday term for [[ | |||
The term is also used when speaking of a relatively easy task being made difficult through opposition or incompetence. "This isn't ''rocket science'', folks!" | The term is also used when speaking of a relatively easy task being made difficult through opposition or incompetence. "This isn't ''rocket science'', folks!" | ||
''Rocket scientist'' describes an aero/astro engineer. It is also used admiringly to refer to any extraordinarily intelligent person, or sarcastically to describe someone who has done something stupid. | ''Rocket scientist'' describes an aero/astro engineer. It is also used admiringly to refer to any extraordinarily intelligent person, or sarcastically to describe someone who has done something stupid. | ||
::Earth is the cradle of mankind, but man cannot live in the cradle forever — [[Konstantin Tsiolkovsky]] | |||
==Confusion in the actual term== | ==Confusion in the actual term== | ||
"Rocket", per se, is either a relatively simple military device, firework, etc.; see [[unguided rocket]], and [[multiple rocket launcher]] for some of the more lethal aspects. Indeed, see [[counter-rocket, artillery and mortar]] (C-RAM) for means of defending against certain of the military systems. | "Rocket", per se, is either a relatively simple military device, firework, etc.; see [[unguided rocket]], and [[multiple rocket launcher]] for some of the more lethal aspects. Indeed, see [[counter-rocket, artillery and mortar]] (C-RAM) for means of defending against certain of the military systems. | ||
In more complex [[space launch vehicle]]s (SLV) and in many, but not all, | In more complex [[space launch vehicle]]s (SLV) and in many, but not all, guided missiles, the [[rocket motor]] is a propulsion subsystem. Many SLVs and missiles have multiple rockets, which variously may be clustered into groups firing in parallel, rocket systems that fire in series or stages (i.e., [[staging (rocket)|step rocket]]), and various hybrids of "booster" and "sustainer" (e.g., [[Atlas (missile)]]. | ||
==Historical rocketry== | ==Historical rocketry== | ||
Possibly first developed for entertainment, but then as powered "fire arrows", the first rockets were invented in China or Korea, probably in the 13th century. They evolved for several hundred years, but were wildly inaccurate, and served more as a psychological than kinetic weapon. With much more knowledge of aerodynamics, it is possible to use fins to give some stability to an unguided rocket, but they remain far less accurate than firearms. | |||
Some improvement came with Sir Henry Congreve's invention of a stabilizing stick that protruded from the rear of the rocket, but, while "the rockets' red glare" stirred Francis Scott Key to write "Star-Spangled Banner" as he watched the night bombardment of Fort McHenry, the rockets actually did very little damage. There were improvements, but it was really not until the [[Second World War]] were the characteristics of unguided rockets understood well enough to make them into useful weapons. | |||
Among their greatest advantages was the ability to be fired from lightweight frameworks or tubes, rather than gun barrels that had to withstand pressure. If the goal was to spread warheads over a wide area, suppressing infantry, perhaps detonating mines, and killing the crews of artillery, [[multiple rocket launcher]]s made good use of the inherent inaccuracy. It was practical to build a short-range tube-guided rocket, and, especially when coupled to the Munroe or "shaped charge", the simplest form of [[explosively formed projectile]], soldiers acquired handheld weapons that could defeat light armor. | |||
==Beginnings of modern rocket propulsion for military and space applications== | ==Beginnings of modern rocket propulsion for military and space applications== | ||
As with many complex fields, a wide variety of technologies had to converge even for the first generation of recognizably modern applications. Even then, progress would stop until another leap of theory or engineering could take place. | |||
To provide the necessary power and control, the [[rocket motor#Liquid fuel systems|liquid fuel rocket engines]] needed to be invented, as they were by [[Robert Goddard]] in 1926.<ref name=GSFC-First>{{citation | |||
| title = The First Liquid Fuel Rocket | |||
| publisher = [[Goddard Space Flight Center]], [[National Aeronautics and Space Administration]] | |||
| url = http://www.gsfc.nasa.gov/gsfc/service/gallery/fact_sheets/general/frocket/frocket.htm}}</ref> Guidance, however, was primitive; the most accurate rocket-propelled weapon of the [[Second World War]] was the Japanese ''Ohka'', which had a human pilot that died with its impact. Automatic control, at that time, was limited to that which could be achieved with relays and analog servomotors, the latter just beginning to explore [[closed-loop control]]. | |||
Vannevar Bush, the principal science advisor to the United States Government in WWII, considered, in 1949, the feasibility of what he considered a guided missile of long range: two thousand miles. <blockquote>It could then hit a target, perhaps even within a mile or two, if all went very well indeed.<ref>{{citation | |||
| author = Bush, Vannevar | |||
| title = Modern Arms and Free Men | |||
| year = 1949 | publisher = Simon & Schuster}}, p. 89</ref></blockquote> | |||
The next steps forward would wait for miniaturized electronics, for sensors, engine and steering control, navigation, and communications. | |||
==Technical challenges of complex rocket-powered systems== | ==Technical challenges of complex rocket-powered systems== | ||
==References== | |||
{{reflist}}[[Category:Suggestion Bot Tag]] |
Latest revision as of 06:00, 13 October 2024
Rocket science is an everyday term for astronautics, or astronautical engineering, the branch of engineering that deals with vehicles that travel in whole or in part through outer space. It is compared and contrasted with aeronautics, the field that covers vehicles travelling within the Earth's atmosphere. There are naturally overlapping areas within the two disciplines, so the modern tendency is to combine the two as aerospace engineering.
The term is also used when speaking of a relatively easy task being made difficult through opposition or incompetence. "This isn't rocket science, folks!"
Rocket scientist describes an aero/astro engineer. It is also used admiringly to refer to any extraordinarily intelligent person, or sarcastically to describe someone who has done something stupid.
- Earth is the cradle of mankind, but man cannot live in the cradle forever — Konstantin Tsiolkovsky
Confusion in the actual term
"Rocket", per se, is either a relatively simple military device, firework, etc.; see unguided rocket, and multiple rocket launcher for some of the more lethal aspects. Indeed, see counter-rocket, artillery and mortar (C-RAM) for means of defending against certain of the military systems.
In more complex space launch vehicles (SLV) and in many, but not all, guided missiles, the rocket motor is a propulsion subsystem. Many SLVs and missiles have multiple rockets, which variously may be clustered into groups firing in parallel, rocket systems that fire in series or stages (i.e., step rocket), and various hybrids of "booster" and "sustainer" (e.g., Atlas (missile).
Historical rocketry
Possibly first developed for entertainment, but then as powered "fire arrows", the first rockets were invented in China or Korea, probably in the 13th century. They evolved for several hundred years, but were wildly inaccurate, and served more as a psychological than kinetic weapon. With much more knowledge of aerodynamics, it is possible to use fins to give some stability to an unguided rocket, but they remain far less accurate than firearms.
Some improvement came with Sir Henry Congreve's invention of a stabilizing stick that protruded from the rear of the rocket, but, while "the rockets' red glare" stirred Francis Scott Key to write "Star-Spangled Banner" as he watched the night bombardment of Fort McHenry, the rockets actually did very little damage. There were improvements, but it was really not until the Second World War were the characteristics of unguided rockets understood well enough to make them into useful weapons.
Among their greatest advantages was the ability to be fired from lightweight frameworks or tubes, rather than gun barrels that had to withstand pressure. If the goal was to spread warheads over a wide area, suppressing infantry, perhaps detonating mines, and killing the crews of artillery, multiple rocket launchers made good use of the inherent inaccuracy. It was practical to build a short-range tube-guided rocket, and, especially when coupled to the Munroe or "shaped charge", the simplest form of explosively formed projectile, soldiers acquired handheld weapons that could defeat light armor.
Beginnings of modern rocket propulsion for military and space applications
As with many complex fields, a wide variety of technologies had to converge even for the first generation of recognizably modern applications. Even then, progress would stop until another leap of theory or engineering could take place.
To provide the necessary power and control, the liquid fuel rocket engines needed to be invented, as they were by Robert Goddard in 1926.[1] Guidance, however, was primitive; the most accurate rocket-propelled weapon of the Second World War was the Japanese Ohka, which had a human pilot that died with its impact. Automatic control, at that time, was limited to that which could be achieved with relays and analog servomotors, the latter just beginning to explore closed-loop control.
Vannevar Bush, the principal science advisor to the United States Government in WWII, considered, in 1949, the feasibility of what he considered a guided missile of long range: two thousand miles.
It could then hit a target, perhaps even within a mile or two, if all went very well indeed.[2]
The next steps forward would wait for miniaturized electronics, for sensors, engine and steering control, navigation, and communications.
Technical challenges of complex rocket-powered systems
References
- ↑ The First Liquid Fuel Rocket, Goddard Space Flight Center, National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- ↑ Bush, Vannevar (1949), Modern Arms and Free Men, Simon & Schuster, p. 89