Talk:Georges Cuvier: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>David E. Volk
m (subpages)
imported>Brian P. Long
(→‎Claim in Intro: new section)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
I am working on this page for a project for my class. Constructive criticism is welcome.
 
==Eduzendium project==
I am working on this page for a project for my class. Constructive criticism is welcome. <small>...said</small> [[User:Reagan Fair|Reagan Fair]] ([[User_talk:Reagan Fair|talk]]) {{#if:12:41, 15 February 2008|12:41, 15 February 2008|}} (<small>''Please sign your talk page posts by simply adding four tildes, ''</small><nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>.)
 
: [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=CZ:Sp08UniversityofColoradoatBoulderANTH4110HumanEvolutionaryBiology&diff=prev&oldid=100321748 Looks like] this person dropped the class? [[User:J. Noel Chiappa|J. Noel Chiappa]] 20:22, 4 May 2008 (CDT)
 
Since I know of a Citizen who wants to work on this topic, I've deleted the page.  (It was blank.) --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 20:42, 27 July 2008 (CDT)
 
== Claim in Intro ==
 
What gives Cuvier pride of place as "the founder ... of the '''comparative method of organismal biology''', and '''functional anatomy''', the essence of which is that the knowledge of structure acquires meaning only when the purpose is known" ? As opposed to Aristotle as a comparative biologist on the one hand, and on the other, a number of earlier biologists and doctors (Galen, e.g.) who were preoccupied with function as well as structure?
 
I'm not presuming to change the article or anything; it's more that I am curious about the implicit distinctions being made here... Thanks, [[User:Brian P. Long|Brian P. Long]] 13:40, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 07:40, 22 February 2009

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  (1769 - 1832) vertebrate paleontologist and comparative anatomist who established the extinction of past lifeforms as an accepted scientific fact. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories:  Anthropology, Archaeology and Eduzendium [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  American English

Eduzendium project

I am working on this page for a project for my class. Constructive criticism is welcome. ...said Reagan Fair (talk) 12:41, 15 February 2008 (Please sign your talk page posts by simply adding four tildes, ~~~~.)

Looks like this person dropped the class? J. Noel Chiappa 20:22, 4 May 2008 (CDT)

Since I know of a Citizen who wants to work on this topic, I've deleted the page. (It was blank.) --Larry Sanger 20:42, 27 July 2008 (CDT)

Claim in Intro

What gives Cuvier pride of place as "the founder ... of the comparative method of organismal biology, and functional anatomy, the essence of which is that the knowledge of structure acquires meaning only when the purpose is known" ? As opposed to Aristotle as a comparative biologist on the one hand, and on the other, a number of earlier biologists and doctors (Galen, e.g.) who were preoccupied with function as well as structure?

I'm not presuming to change the article or anything; it's more that I am curious about the implicit distinctions being made here... Thanks, Brian P. Long 13:40, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Georges_Cuvier&oldid=409298"