Talk:Petrarch: Difference between revisions
imported>Theodore Beale (New page: Yes, Petrarch would be best. His birth name was Francesco Petracco which he later latinized to Francesco Petrarca. Petrarch is an Anglicization; alone it is common usage but Francesco Pe...) |
imported>Subpagination Bot m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details)) |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Yes, Petrarch would be best. His birth name was Francesco Petracco which he later latinized to Francesco Petrarca. Petrarch is an Anglicization; alone it is common usage but Francesco Petrarch is historically incorrect. | {{subpages}} | ||
Yes, Petrarch would be best. His birth name was Francesco Petracco which he later latinized to Francesco Petrarca. Petrarch is an Anglicization; alone it is common usage but Francesco Petrarch is historically incorrect. --{{unsigned|Theodore Beale}} | |||
---- | |||
(edit conflict!) | |||
Don't hesitate to move the article back to [[Francesco Petrarch]]; maybe that's right, I don't claim to know much about him. It's just that we prefer the names by which someone is most commonly known, and there are some historical figures, like [[Michelangelo]] (often from the Renaissance, no?), who have these sorts of single names. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 19:32, 1 November 2007 (CDT) | |||
---- | |||
No conflict, I was offering support for your action. In fact, I would have moved the article myself, but I didn't know how.[[User:Theodore Beale|Theodore Beale]] 05:07, 2 November 2007 (CDT) |
Latest revision as of 13:55, 12 November 2007
Yes, Petrarch would be best. His birth name was Francesco Petracco which he later latinized to Francesco Petrarca. Petrarch is an Anglicization; alone it is common usage but Francesco Petrarch is historically incorrect. --...said Theodore Beale (talk) (Please sign your talk page posts by simply adding four tildes, ~~~~.)
(edit conflict!)
Don't hesitate to move the article back to Francesco Petrarch; maybe that's right, I don't claim to know much about him. It's just that we prefer the names by which someone is most commonly known, and there are some historical figures, like Michelangelo (often from the Renaissance, no?), who have these sorts of single names. --Larry Sanger 19:32, 1 November 2007 (CDT)
No conflict, I was offering support for your action. In fact, I would have moved the article myself, but I didn't know how.Theodore Beale 05:07, 2 November 2007 (CDT)
- Article with Definition
- Literature Category Check
- Classics Category Check
- History Category Check
- Developing Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Literature Developing Articles
- Literature Nonstub Articles
- Literature Internal Articles
- Classics Developing Articles
- Classics Nonstub Articles
- Classics Internal Articles
- History Developing Articles
- History Nonstub Articles
- History Internal Articles
- Literature Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Classics Underlinked Articles
- History Underlinked Articles
- History tag