Tortious interference: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Brian Dean Abramson
(start a "Tortious interference" article)
 
mNo edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Tortious interference''' is a [[tort]] which arises when a party unjustifiably interferes with an expectation of another party. There are three common areas of tortious interference, these being with commercial relations, with contract, and with testamentary expectations.
{{subpages}}
'''Tortious interference''' is a [[tort]] (legally wrongful act) that arises when a party unjustifiably interferes with an expectation of another party. There are three common areas of tortious interference, these being with commercial relations, with contract, and with testamentary expectations.
 
In order to recover on a tortious interference claim, the plaintiff must generally satisfy four elements:
 
# the existence of a business relationship between the plaintiff and another party;
# the defendant's knowledge of that relationship;
# an intentional and unjustified interference with the relationship by the defendant; and
# that the aggrieved party was damaged as a result of the defendant's interference.
 
[[Category:Suggestion Bot Tag]]

Latest revision as of 16:01, 29 October 2024

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

Tortious interference is a tort (legally wrongful act) that arises when a party unjustifiably interferes with an expectation of another party. There are three common areas of tortious interference, these being with commercial relations, with contract, and with testamentary expectations.

In order to recover on a tortious interference claim, the plaintiff must generally satisfy four elements:

  1. the existence of a business relationship between the plaintiff and another party;
  2. the defendant's knowledge of that relationship;
  3. an intentional and unjustified interference with the relationship by the defendant; and
  4. that the aggrieved party was damaged as a result of the defendant's interference.