Talk:Historic theaters of California: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger
No edit summary
imported>Subpagination Bot
m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details))
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{checklist
{{subpages}}
|                abc = Historic theaters of California
|                cat1 = Visual Arts
|                cat2 = History
|                cat3 =
|          cat_check = n
|              status = 2
|        underlinked = y
|            cleanup = n
|                  by = --[[User:Todd Coles|Todd Coles]] 15:51, 3 August 2007 (CDT)
}}


== move ==
== move ==
Line 15: Line 5:
Perhaps this article would be better placed at [[California, Historic theaters]] or something similar.  Most of our other articles seem to follow that format. --[[User:Todd Coles|Todd Coles]] 15:53, 3 August 2007 (CDT)
Perhaps this article would be better placed at [[California, Historic theaters]] or something similar.  Most of our other articles seem to follow that format. --[[User:Todd Coles|Todd Coles]] 15:53, 3 August 2007 (CDT)


Actually, a catalog of California theaters would belong on [[California theater/Catalogs/Historic theaters]].  Since we have instigated [[CZ:Subpages]] officially, catalogs should not be appearing in the main article space. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 10:03, 18 September 2007 (CDT)
Actually, a catalog of California theaters would belong on [[California theater/Catalogs/Historic theaters]].  Since we have instigated [[CZ:Subpages]] officially, catalogs should appear only on subpages. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 10:03, 18 September 2007 (CDT)
 
Also, I disagree with Todd's point about the use of the comma in this sort of case.  History editor Richard Jensen uses commas in history articles; but before too much longer we'll be taking a Council vote on this (actually, a question we might vote on first is whether the History Workgroup can set its own policy on such issues). --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 10:06, 18 September 2007 (CDT)
 
== historic significance ==
 
Could you make a case that these theatres had a historic significance in the development of Cali's hollywood dominance, and certainly a major contributing factor to their demographics since its inception..  I wouldn't be so quick to dismiss history as a category. --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 01:37, 8 October 2007 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 12:54, 3 November 2007

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Definition [?]
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition Please add a brief definition or description.
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Visual Arts and History [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English
To do.


Metadata here


move

Perhaps this article would be better placed at California, Historic theaters or something similar. Most of our other articles seem to follow that format. --Todd Coles 15:53, 3 August 2007 (CDT)

Actually, a catalog of California theaters would belong on California theater/Catalogs/Historic theaters. Since we have instigated CZ:Subpages officially, catalogs should appear only on subpages. --Larry Sanger 10:03, 18 September 2007 (CDT)

Also, I disagree with Todd's point about the use of the comma in this sort of case. History editor Richard Jensen uses commas in history articles; but before too much longer we'll be taking a Council vote on this (actually, a question we might vote on first is whether the History Workgroup can set its own policy on such issues). --Larry Sanger 10:06, 18 September 2007 (CDT)

historic significance

Could you make a case that these theatres had a historic significance in the development of Cali's hollywood dominance, and certainly a major contributing factor to their demographics since its inception.. I wouldn't be so quick to dismiss history as a category. --Robert W King 01:37, 8 October 2007 (CDT)