Talk:Treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Russell D. Jones
m (Talk:Guadalupe-Hidalgo, Treaty of moved to Talk:Treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo: Proper title, removed punctuation)
imported>Russell D. Jones
(→‎Title: box)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
==Title==
==Title==
{{Box|This discussion point referred to the old title "Guadalupe-Hidalgo, Treaty of".|Orange}}
Would it make more sense to store this article at [[Treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo]] and then fill in the metadata page "abc" field with "Guadalupe-Hidalgo, Treaty of" for alphabetization purposes? This would make wikilinking in other articles a whole lot easier. --[[User:Joe Quick|Joe Quick]] 18:18, 23 November 2007 (CST)
Would it make more sense to store this article at [[Treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo]] and then fill in the metadata page "abc" field with "Guadalupe-Hidalgo, Treaty of" for alphabetization purposes? This would make wikilinking in other articles a whole lot easier. --[[User:Joe Quick|Joe Quick]] 18:18, 23 November 2007 (CST)
::we have a redirect already in place so there are no linking problems. "Treaty of...." or "Battle of ..." is poor form, in my opinion.[[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 22:34, 23 November 2007 (CST)
::we have a redirect already in place so there are no linking problems. "Treaty of...." or "Battle of ..." is poor form, in my opinion.[[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 22:34, 23 November 2007 (CST)
:::Redirects ''do'' create more work for the server, but not that much really, so this isn't a big issue.  I'm not clear on why you think that "Treaty of..." is poor form though.  This is what the [http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9038276/Treaty-of-Guadalupe-Hidalgo Encyclopedia Britannica uses].  The form "..., Treaty of" is appropriate for an index, but CZ isn't an index and alphabetization in index-like parts of CZ is accomplished by the "abc" field of the metadata page. --[[User:Joe Quick|Joe Quick]] 00:22, 26 November 2007 (CST)
:::Redirects ''do'' create more work for the server, but not that much really, so this isn't a big issue.  I'm not clear on why you think that "Treaty of..." is poor form though.  This is what the [http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9038276/Treaty-of-Guadalupe-Hidalgo Encyclopedia Britannica uses].  The form "..., Treaty of" is appropriate for an index, but CZ isn't an index and alphabetization in index-like parts of CZ is accomplished by the "abc" field of the metadata page. --[[User:Joe Quick|Joe Quick]] 00:22, 26 November 2007 (CST)
Page moved. Title is now "Treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo."  [[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] 12:01, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 06:04, 5 August 2009

This article is developed but not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Documents [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  The 1848 treaty that ended the Mexican-American War and created a boundary that added New Mexico, Arizona and California to the U.S. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories:  History, Politics and Military [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  American English

Title

This discussion point referred to the old title "Guadalupe-Hidalgo, Treaty of".

Would it make more sense to store this article at Treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo and then fill in the metadata page "abc" field with "Guadalupe-Hidalgo, Treaty of" for alphabetization purposes? This would make wikilinking in other articles a whole lot easier. --Joe Quick 18:18, 23 November 2007 (CST)

we have a redirect already in place so there are no linking problems. "Treaty of...." or "Battle of ..." is poor form, in my opinion.Richard Jensen 22:34, 23 November 2007 (CST)
Redirects do create more work for the server, but not that much really, so this isn't a big issue. I'm not clear on why you think that "Treaty of..." is poor form though. This is what the Encyclopedia Britannica uses. The form "..., Treaty of" is appropriate for an index, but CZ isn't an index and alphabetization in index-like parts of CZ is accomplished by the "abc" field of the metadata page. --Joe Quick 00:22, 26 November 2007 (CST)

Page moved. Title is now "Treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo." Russell D. Jones 12:01, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Treaty_of_Guadalupe-Hidalgo&oldid=31298"