Talk:Mercury (disambiguation): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>John Stephenson (Why are requested the delete) |
imported>J. Noel Chiappa m (Talk:Mercury moved to Talk:Mercury (disambiguation): Keep with disambiguation page) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:Fair enough, but here we are two weeks later, and these articles are yet to appear. I just put the delete on because it looked like not much was going on. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 02:07, 15 June 2007 (CDT) | :Fair enough, but here we are two weeks later, and these articles are yet to appear. I just put the delete on because it looked like not much was going on. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 02:07, 15 June 2007 (CDT) | ||
If you explain the working of an incandescant lamp it wont change much even after years. [[User:Robert Tito|Robert Tito]] | <span style="background:grey"> <font color="yellow"><b>[[User talk:Robert Tito|Talk]]</b></font> </span> 09:14, 15 June 2007 (CDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 06:25, 2 June 2008
Speedy deletion contested on the basis of common sense - there is no question whatsoever that at least three of the current redlinks are articles that will be written, probably fairly soon. Brian Dean Abramson 23:07, 2 June 2007 (CDT)
this seems ok
to have disambiguation, as chemistry will have a mercury article, astronomy as well no doubt, and the mercury space project is famous. so speedy delete seems not appropriate. Robert Tito | Talk 18:38, 3 June 2007 (CDT)
- Fair enough, but here we are two weeks later, and these articles are yet to appear. I just put the delete on because it looked like not much was going on. John Stephenson 02:07, 15 June 2007 (CDT)
If you explain the working of an incandescant lamp it wont change much even after years. Robert Tito | Talk 09:14, 15 June 2007 (CDT)