Talk:Artificial intelligence: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Stu Rodgers
No edit summary
 
imported>Subpagination Bot
m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details))
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
I have specifically avoided a discussion on the notions of "strong" AI and "weak" AI.  These categories have been used by some to denote the ultimate goals of the AI community.  It is not clear to me the the "entire AI community" has any "shared or common goal" so I have avoided the subject.
{{subpages}}
Whether the field of AI will ultimately build a machine that is "smarter" than the average human is a matter of debate.  I certainly feel that the nearer term goals of making systems that are improved with respect to adaptiveness, reactiveness, deliberateness and complexity and worth pursuing in the meantime.
 
----
I have specifically avoided a discussion on the notions of "strong" AI and "weak" AI.  These categories have been used by some to denote the ultimate goals of the AI community.  It is not clear to me that the "entire AI community" has any "shared or common goal" so I have avoided the subject.
Whether the field of AI will ultimately build a machine that is "smarter" than the average human is a matter of debate.  I certainly feel that the nearer term goals of making systems that are improved with respect to adaptiveness, reactiveness, autonomousness and complexity are worth pursuing in the meantime.
--[[User:Stu Rodgers|Stu Rodgers]] 10:39, 9 May 2007 (CDT)
--[[User:Stu Rodgers|Stu Rodgers]] 10:39, 9 May 2007 (CDT)
== Subfields ==
I think we need to rethink the list of subfields. For one thing, I'm not sure that "exprt systems" really designates a subfield of AI, but is more of a marketing/businees term. In addition, it's not at all clear why both connectionism and ANN are on the list. I'll go ahead and edit/expand it a bit. [[User:Greg Woodhouse|Greg Woodhouse]] 15:40, 26 May 2007 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 20:13, 24 September 2007

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition The field of science and engineering involved with the study, design and manufacture of systems that exhibit qualities such as adaptivity, complexity, goal pursuit, reactiveness to surroundings, and others that are commonly attributed to "intelligence." [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Computers, Engineering and Mathematics [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

I have specifically avoided a discussion on the notions of "strong" AI and "weak" AI. These categories have been used by some to denote the ultimate goals of the AI community. It is not clear to me that the "entire AI community" has any "shared or common goal" so I have avoided the subject. Whether the field of AI will ultimately build a machine that is "smarter" than the average human is a matter of debate. I certainly feel that the nearer term goals of making systems that are improved with respect to adaptiveness, reactiveness, autonomousness and complexity are worth pursuing in the meantime. --Stu Rodgers 10:39, 9 May 2007 (CDT)

Subfields

I think we need to rethink the list of subfields. For one thing, I'm not sure that "exprt systems" really designates a subfield of AI, but is more of a marketing/businees term. In addition, it's not at all clear why both connectionism and ANN are on the list. I'll go ahead and edit/expand it a bit. Greg Woodhouse 15:40, 26 May 2007 (CDT)