Talk:Milton Friedman: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Richard Jensen
(not active in sociology)
imported>Nick Gardner
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{checklist
{{subpages}}
|                abc = Friedman, Milton
 
|                cat1 = Economics
== Scope for development? ==
|                cat2 = Politics
 
|                cat3 = History
It would seem possible to give readers a deeper and more balanced account of Milton Friedman's contribution,  and of his influence on current economic thinking. Something could be said about his concept of "positive economics";  and it should be possible to give readers a broad indication in non-technical terms of the nature of his criticism of Keynesianism, and  of his own  policy proposals.  Some attention  might also be given to the need to ensure compliance with CZ standards of impartiality. I do hope that someone intends to do something further editing  to meet those needs? [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 16:37, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
|          cat_check = y
|              status = 1
|        underlinked = y
|            cleanup = y
|                  by = [[User:João Prado Ribeiro Campos|J. R. Campos]] 12:23, 24 April 2007 (CDT)
}}

Latest revision as of 10:39, 20 January 2010

This article is developed but not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition Capitalist, libertarian economist and political theorist and winner of the 1976 Nobel Prize in Economics. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Economics, Politics and History [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

Scope for development?

It would seem possible to give readers a deeper and more balanced account of Milton Friedman's contribution, and of his influence on current economic thinking. Something could be said about his concept of "positive economics"; and it should be possible to give readers a broad indication in non-technical terms of the nature of his criticism of Keynesianism, and of his own policy proposals. Some attention might also be given to the need to ensure compliance with CZ standards of impartiality. I do hope that someone intends to do something further editing to meet those needs? Nick Gardner 16:37, 20 January 2010 (UTC)