Talk:Leser v. Garnett: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>David Martin No edit summary |
imported>Subpagination Bot m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details)) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | |||
Adam, welcome to the project and thanks for importing your article here. Just, please, could you take some time in the next few days and improve this article over the Wikipedia version? I want to avoid our making CZ into a "best of Wikipedia" or anything like a mirror of Wikipedia. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 11:48, 26 February 2007 (CST) | Adam, welcome to the project and thanks for importing your article here. Just, please, could you take some time in the next few days and improve this article over the Wikipedia version? I want to avoid our making CZ into a "best of Wikipedia" or anything like a mirror of Wikipedia. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 11:48, 26 February 2007 (CST) | ||
: Do you have anything specific that you feel would improve this article over its current version? The article is short by necessity (the opinion itself is a very direct 4 paragraphs), and I think it covers all the important points. I'm happy to work to improve it, but it already seems basically complete to me. - [[User:Adam Vartanian|Adam Vartanian]] 13:56, 26 February 2007 (CST) | : Do you have anything specific that you feel would improve this article over its current version? The article is short by necessity (the opinion itself is a very direct 4 paragraphs), and I think it covers all the important points. I'm happy to work to improve it, but it already seems basically complete to me. - [[User:Adam Vartanian|Adam Vartanian]] 13:56, 26 February 2007 (CST) | ||
No ideas (well, no time to offer them). It's hard to believe that you think a better job can't be done. I can ''always'' think of ways to improve what I write, and I don't think that's just because I'm a crappy writer. :-) Then we should delete it, shouldn't we? Because, as I said, we aren't making a mirror of WP here. Please see [[CZ:How to convert Wikipedia articles to Citizendium articles]]. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 17:08, 26 February 2007 (CST) | No ideas (well, no time to offer them). It's hard to believe that you think a better job can't be done. I can ''always'' think of ways to improve what I write, and I don't think that's just because I'm a crappy writer. :-) Then we should delete it, shouldn't we? Because, as I said, we aren't making a mirror of WP here. Please see [[CZ:How to convert Wikipedia articles to Citizendium articles]]. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 17:08, 26 February 2007 (CST) | ||
Latest revision as of 06:48, 4 November 2007
Adam, welcome to the project and thanks for importing your article here. Just, please, could you take some time in the next few days and improve this article over the Wikipedia version? I want to avoid our making CZ into a "best of Wikipedia" or anything like a mirror of Wikipedia. --Larry Sanger 11:48, 26 February 2007 (CST)
- Do you have anything specific that you feel would improve this article over its current version? The article is short by necessity (the opinion itself is a very direct 4 paragraphs), and I think it covers all the important points. I'm happy to work to improve it, but it already seems basically complete to me. - Adam Vartanian 13:56, 26 February 2007 (CST)
No ideas (well, no time to offer them). It's hard to believe that you think a better job can't be done. I can always think of ways to improve what I write, and I don't think that's just because I'm a crappy writer. :-) Then we should delete it, shouldn't we? Because, as I said, we aren't making a mirror of WP here. Please see CZ:How to convert Wikipedia articles to Citizendium articles. --Larry Sanger 17:08, 26 February 2007 (CST)