Research peer review/Related Articles: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Daniel Mietchen |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
<!-- List topics here that are included by this topic. --> | <!-- List topics here that are included by this topic. --> | ||
{{r|Journal peer review}} | {{r|Journal peer review}} | ||
{{r|Conference peer review}} | |||
{{r|Grant peer review}} | {{r|Grant peer review}} | ||
{{r|Single-blind peer review||**}} | {{r|Single-blind peer review||**}} | ||
{{r|Double-blind peer review||**}} | {{r|Double-blind peer review||**}} | ||
| Line 38: | Line 39: | ||
{{r|Preprint}} | {{r|Preprint}} | ||
{{r|Research proposal}} | {{r|Research proposal}} | ||
{{r|Peer Review Radio}} | |||
==Articles related by keyphrases (Bot populated)== | |||
{{r|Valuation using discounted cash flows}} | |||
{{r|Battle of Ap Bac}} | |||
Latest revision as of 11:00, 11 October 2024
- See also changes related to Research peer review, or pages that link to Research peer review or to this page or whose text contains "Research peer review".
Parent topics
- Research [r]: Add brief definition or description
- Scientific method [r]: The concept of systematic inquiry based on hypotheses and their testing in light of empirical evidence. [e]
Subtopics
- Journal peer review [r]: The most common variant of manuscript peer review, in which scholarly manuscripts are being evaluated; used by academic publishing agencies to decide about formal publication in academic journals. [e]
- Conference peer review [r]: A variant of peer review in which suggested contributions to a scientific conference are evaluated in order to allocate slots in the conference schedule and space for the poster sessions. [e]
- Grant peer review [r]: A variant of peer review in which grant proposals are being evaluated; used by research funding agencies to decide how to distribute their funds. [e]
- Single-blind peer review [r]: The currently most common variant of peer review, in which the reviewers of a scholarly manuscript or grant proposal are informed about the identity of the authors, but not vice versa. [e]
- Double-blind peer review [r]: A variant of peer review in which neither the authors nor the reviewers of a scholarly manuscript or grant proposal are informed about each other's identity. [e]
- Open peer review [r]: A variant of peer review in which the authors of a scholarly manuscript or grant proposal are informed about the identity of the reviewers. [e]
- Public peer review [r]: A variant of peer review in which the evaluation of a scholarly manuscript or grant proposal takes place in public before formal publication. [e]
- Post-publication peer review [r]: Add brief definition or description
- Academia [r]: An umbrella term for scholars and their institutions. [e]
- Academic journal [r]: A regularly-published, peer-reviewed publication that publishes scholarship relating to an academic discipline. [e]
- Scientific journal [r]: A publication venue for original research and scholarly review articles — for more than three centuries on paper and now increasingly online. [e]
- Scientometrics [r]: The quantitative study of the results of scientific research. [e]
- Impact factor [r]: A widely used annual measure of how often the papers recently published in an academic journal have been cited in the academic literature. [e]
- Tenure track [r]: Add brief definition or description
- Scholarly manuscript [r]: A scientific communication written up for formal publication. [e]
- Preprint [r]: An advance copy, in digital format, of a manuscript intended for print publication. [e]
- Research proposal [r]: A description of planned scientific research that is formally submitted to a research funding agency. [e]