Talk:Competition policy/Draft: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>D. Matt Innis No edit summary |
John Leach (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "CZ:Article Mechanics" to "CZ:Article mechanics") |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
==APPROVED Version 1.0== | ==APPROVED Version 1.0== | ||
Congratulations again Nick et al!<div class="usermessage plainlinks">Discussion for [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Competition_policy&oldid=100210726 Version 1.0] stopped here. Please continue further discussion under this break. </div> | Congratulations again Nick et al!<div class="usermessage plainlinks">Discussion for [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Competition_policy&oldid=100210726 Version 1.0] stopped here. Please continue further discussion under this break. </div> | ||
The article does not appear to begin with a definition, which is contrary to [[CZ:Article mechanics]]. Can we add one in the next version, please? --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 12:46, 24 January 2008 (CST) | |||
In my opinion, the opening sentence says all that can be said by way of definition. | |||
[[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 15:28, 24 January 2008 (CST) |
Latest revision as of 16:02, 5 March 2024
Fixed, I think? --Robert W King 16:27, 13 November 2007 (CST)
- It still doesnt appear in the To Approve listings:-((( --Martin Baldwin-Edwards 16:29, 13 November 2007 (CST)
- Link for me the "To Approve" listings. --Robert W King 16:36, 13 November 2007 (CST)
- It still doesnt appear in the To Approve listings:-((( --Martin Baldwin-Edwards 16:29, 13 November 2007 (CST)
http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Category:Articles_to_Approve But you can also check from the Workgroup pages, section ToApprove. Martin
- Moved to the talk page of that category. --Robert W King 16:43, 13 November 2007 (CST)
What does Robert King mean? Nick Gardner 16:33, 13 November 2007 (CST)
- Is this a philosophical, existential, or abstract question? --Robert W King 16:37, 13 November 2007 (CST)
- No, it's a practical question from someone who doesnt know the technical problems we have. Better to keep away, Nick:-) --Martin Baldwin-Edwards 16:39, 13 November 2007 (CST)
APPROVED Version 1.0
Congratulations again Nick et al!
The article does not appear to begin with a definition, which is contrary to CZ:Article mechanics. Can we add one in the next version, please? --Larry Sanger 12:46, 24 January 2008 (CST)
In my opinion, the opening sentence says all that can be said by way of definition. Nick Gardner 15:28, 24 January 2008 (CST)