User:DavidGoodman: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Supten Sarbadhikari
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{AccountNotLive}}
I'm David Goodman (member of the Citizendium Editorial Council)
I'm David Goodman (member of the Citizendium Editorial Council)
* user name: DavidGoodman;  email: dgoodmanny@gmail.com;  WP name: DGG  
* user name: DavidGoodman;  email: dgoodmanny@gmail.com;  WP name: DGG  


** currently working in CZ on: open access, journals, and related topics
** currently working in CZ on: open access, journals, and related topics
''I apologize for my recent absence, but I'm back, & just now starting to edit again''
(I apologize for my recent absence, but I'm back, & just now starting to edit again on a limited basis)


CV (abridged)
CV (abridged)
Line 15: Line 16:
* Biological Sciences Bibliographer & Research Librarian, Princeton
* Biological Sciences Bibliographer & Research Librarian, Princeton
* Assoc. Prof. of Library Science, Long isand Univ.  
* Assoc. Prof. of Library Science, Long isand Univ.  
* very temporarily retired.  
* retired from both.  
 
Current projects:
* ProjectCOUNTER: Counting Online Usage of Networked Electronic Resources.
* Open access (analysis & advocacy)
* Online resources (reviewer and consultant)
* Scientific publishing (navigating between publishers & libraries)


Interests in CZ:
Interests in CZ:
*fixing errors, especially in basic pages
potential:
* Writing Library-related and publishing-related pages
* Writing Library-related and publishing-related pages
* Writing some of the general biology pages
* Writing some of the general biology pages
Line 33: Line 30:


Working style:  
Working style:  
* I prefer to work incrementally, in hour-size chunks.
* I'll work with anyone who's willing to work with me
* I'll work with anyone who's willing to work with me
* I like to consult on major changes, and to negotiate off-line
* I like to consult on major changes, and to negotiate off-line


CZ possible minority positions:
CZ possible minority positions:
* Sensitive topics can (& must) be written about, & I'm willing to try--"family friendly" (an unfortunate terms as it is generally a code word for censorship according to the dictates of U.S. religious fundamentalists and extreme right wing politicians), should here mean anything that someone in a family might want to know.
* Distrust of academic specialists who think too much of their credentials   
* Distrust of academic specialists who think too much of their credentials   
* Joint effort is usually better than the work of a single author.  
* Joint effort is usually better than the work of a single author.  
* Almost all math & science articles can & should be written so those without a degree in the subject can understand some of it--and the same for any seemingly esoteric subject.  
* Almost all math & science articles can & should be written so those without a degree in the subject can understand some of it--and the same for any seemingly esoteric subject.  
WP identity: User:DGG (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:DGG - administrator


WP minority positions:
WP minority positions:
Line 52: Line 49:
   
   


[[Category:CZ Editors|Goodman, David]]
[[Category:Inactive CZ Editors|Goodman, David]]
[[Category:Biology Editors|Goodman, David]]
[[Category:Inactive Biology Editors|Goodman, David]]
[[Category:Library and Information Science Editors|Goodman, David]]
[[Category:Inactive Library and Information Science Editors|Goodman, David]]
[[Category:Religion Authors|Goodman, David]]
[[Category:Religion Authors|Goodman, David]]
[[Category:CZ Editorial Council Members|Goodman, David]]
 
[[Category:Editor members continuing a 2007 term|Goodman, David]]


Biases (not usually obvious here, I hope):
Biases (not usually obvious here, I hope):
Line 65: Line 61:


[[/comments]],..[[/text for pages]],..[[/pages in progress]],.. [[/sandbox]]
[[/comments]],..[[/text for pages]],..[[/pages in progress]],.. [[/sandbox]]
[[Category:CZ Editorial Council Emeritus Members]]

Latest revision as of 02:42, 22 November 2023


The account of this former contributor was not re-activated after the server upgrade of March 2022.


I'm David Goodman (member of the Citizendium Editorial Council)

  • user name: DavidGoodman; email: dgoodmanny@gmail.com; WP name: DGG
    • currently working in CZ on: open access, journals, and related topics

(I apologize for my recent absence, but I'm back, & just now starting to edit again on a limited basis)

CV (abridged)

  • B.S. Brooklyn College, (math)
  • Ph.D Berkeley, (Molecular biology--Gunther Stent's lab)
  • Post-Doc, Berkeley, (Evolutionary biochemistry--Allen Wilson's lab)
  • Assistant Prof. of Biochemistry, Rutgers-Newark
  • MLS Rutgers
  • Chemistry Librarian, Princeton
  • Biology Librarian, Princeton
  • Biological Sciences Bibliographer & Research Librarian, Princeton
  • Assoc. Prof. of Library Science, Long isand Univ.
  • retired from both.

Interests in CZ:

  • fixing errors, especially in basic pages

potential:

  • Writing Library-related and publishing-related pages
  • Writing some of the general biology pages
  • Checking the biology for the parts I know enough
  • Possibly working on some of the sexuality-related pages
  • Reference sources for anything (writing or editing)
  • Getting the Public Domain articles in science sourced & upgraded
    • I expect to do more revising than original writing.

Working style:

  • I'll work with anyone who's willing to work with me
  • I like to consult on major changes, and to negotiate off-line

CZ possible minority positions:

  • Distrust of academic specialists who think too much of their credentials
  • Joint effort is usually better than the work of a single author.
  • Almost all math & science articles can & should be written so those without a degree in the subject can understand some of it--and the same for any seemingly esoteric subject.

WP identity: User:DGG (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:DGG - administrator

WP minority positions:

  • Using Public Domain sources without exact quotations is plagiarism.
  • Point of view forks are the clearest way of handling some topics.
  • Web sources, even blogs, can be used as Reliable sources for determining notability. The world has changed since WP started.

(Relatively) absolutist position in any context:

  • Freedom of speech.


Biases (not usually obvious here, I hope):

  • Marxist, Atheist, Jewish, Academic, Internationalist


/comments,../text for pages,../pages in progress,.. /sandbox