Template:CharterVote2/30/Discussion: Difference between revisions
imported>Joe Quick No edit summary |
imported>D. Matt Innis (how many members do we want?) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:I still think point 4 belongs in Article 28, which is specific to the Editorial Council already. -[[User:Joe Quick|Joe Quick]] 04:36, 17 July 2010 (UTC) | :I still think point 4 belongs in Article 28, which is specific to the Editorial Council already. -[[User:Joe Quick|Joe Quick]] 04:36, 17 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
::Shouldn't this charter say something about how many members the councils have? Can we elect everyone that is nominated? How many can be nominated? I don't think we should let the councils decide, should we? [[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] 11:55, 17 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:55, 17 July 2010
Each Council shall
1. have a quorum corresponding to the simple majority of its members;
2. develop written guidelines to define and explain methods of communicating with that particular Council;
3. <--[Moved from Article 24]--> be empowered to appoint delegates to perform specific tasks for a specific period of time (not more than two years) provide that the responsibility for the actions of a delegate shall always remain with the appointing Council.
4. In the Editorial Council, a number of members corresponding to the quorum shall be Editors while the rest of the members shall be Citizens who are not Editors.
I'm not sure this is a version I'm yet happy with. I'd like to sit with it a bit and see what you all think about it. Russell D. Jones 01:03, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
- I still think point 4 belongs in Article 28, which is specific to the Editorial Council already. -Joe Quick 04:36, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
- Shouldn't this charter say something about how many members the councils have? Can we elect everyone that is nominated? How many can be nominated? I don't think we should let the councils decide, should we? D. Matt Innis 11:55, 17 July 2010 (UTC)