Talk:Neutrino: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Chunbum Park mNo edit summary |
imported>Anthony.Sebastian |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
The boxed quotations should be removed. They are strangely outdated, despite their recent origin. For example, the quotation by Aniĉin seemingly ignores the notion that matter as we know it is only an insignificant portion of what constitutes the universe, which is mainly dark matter and dark energy. The quotation by Close ignores the fact that we know nothing significant about dark energy and dark matter, and we do know at least a little about neutrinos. [[User:John R. Brews|John R. Brews]] 15:23, 24 September 2011 (UTC) | The boxed quotations should be removed. They are strangely outdated, despite their recent origin. For example, the quotation by Aniĉin seemingly ignores the notion that matter as we know it is only an insignificant portion of what constitutes the universe, which is mainly dark matter and dark energy. The quotation by Close ignores the fact that we know nothing significant about dark energy and dark matter, and we do know at least a little about neutrinos. [[User:John R. Brews|John R. Brews]] 15:23, 24 September 2011 (UTC) | ||
:I agree, both authors apparently failed to consider 'dark matter' and 'dark energy'. I will review the original sources to see if I missed something. In the meantime, I will delete the boxed quotations. Thanks. [[User:Anthony.Sebastian|Anthony.Sebastian]] 03:24, 25 September 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:24, 24 September 2011
Start Neutrino as stub
Start Neutrino as stub. Needs checking/editing/developing by physicists. Anthony.Sebastian 19:49, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
Hoping to develop article at student level, high school, freshman college. Anthony.Sebastian 04:50, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
Boxed quotations are obsolete and should be deleted
The boxed quotations should be removed. They are strangely outdated, despite their recent origin. For example, the quotation by Aniĉin seemingly ignores the notion that matter as we know it is only an insignificant portion of what constitutes the universe, which is mainly dark matter and dark energy. The quotation by Close ignores the fact that we know nothing significant about dark energy and dark matter, and we do know at least a little about neutrinos. John R. Brews 15:23, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
- I agree, both authors apparently failed to consider 'dark matter' and 'dark energy'. I will review the original sources to see if I missed something. In the meantime, I will delete the boxed quotations. Thanks. Anthony.Sebastian 03:24, 25 September 2011 (UTC)