Talk:Subjective-objective dichotomy: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>John R. Brews
(Talk page generated using Special:MetadataForm)
 
imported>Anthony.Sebastian
(→‎Origin of this page: Attn: John R. Brews)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
== Origin of this page ==
This material is the portion of the Wikipedia article [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subject%E2%80%93object_problem#cite_note-Colyvan-25 Subject–object problem] that I wrote myself in a long series of edits beginning [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Subject%E2%80%93object_problem&oldid=530619380 December 2012] and ending in [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Subject%E2%80%93object_problem&oldid=530619380 January 2013] . [[User:John R. Brews|John R. Brews]] 21:00, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
:Kudos, John. A very interesting article, provocative, neatly organized, brimming with thought-provoking quotes.
:I, myself, find that I can never leave my biases outside the door of my laboratory. [[User:Anthony.Sebastian|Anthony.Sebastian]] 03:29, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 21:29, 9 August 2013

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition The philosophical separation of the world into objects (entities) which are perceived or otherwise presumed to exist as entities, by subjects (observers). [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Philosophy, Physics and Psychology [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English

Origin of this page

This material is the portion of the Wikipedia article Subject–object problem that I wrote myself in a long series of edits beginning December 2012 and ending in January 2013 . John R. Brews 21:00, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Kudos, John. A very interesting article, provocative, neatly organized, brimming with thought-provoking quotes.
I, myself, find that I can never leave my biases outside the door of my laboratory. Anthony.Sebastian 03:29, 10 August 2013 (UTC)