Talk:History of the House of Lords: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Peter Jackson
No edit summary
imported>Nick Gardner
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:


As the government has now officially dropped its reform proposals, I'd say they're not part of the history of the House and I'm going to remove them from this article. Maybe there's somewhere else they can go. [[User:Peter Jackson|Peter Jackson]] 10:16, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
As the government has now officially dropped its reform proposals, I'd say they're not part of the history of the House and I'm going to remove them from this article. Maybe there's somewhere else they can go. [[User:Peter Jackson|Peter Jackson]] 10:16, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
:I agree [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 21:21, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:21, 4 September 2012

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Definition [?]
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition Please add a brief definition or description.
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories History and Politics [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English
To do.


Metadata here


This article was contributed by Peter Jackson as a paragraph in the article on the House of Lords. I moved it to this position with Peter's consent because its length is inconsistent with the format of that article. Nick Gardner 08:15, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

As the government has now officially dropped its reform proposals, I'd say they're not part of the history of the House and I'm going to remove them from this article. Maybe there's somewhere else they can go. Peter Jackson 10:16, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

I agree Nick Gardner 21:21, 4 September 2012 (UTC)