Talk:History of the House of Lords: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Peter Jackson No edit summary |
imported>Nick Gardner No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
As the government has now officially dropped its reform proposals, I'd say they're not part of the history of the House and I'm going to remove them from this article. Maybe there's somewhere else they can go. [[User:Peter Jackson|Peter Jackson]] 10:16, 4 September 2012 (UTC) | As the government has now officially dropped its reform proposals, I'd say they're not part of the history of the House and I'm going to remove them from this article. Maybe there's somewhere else they can go. [[User:Peter Jackson|Peter Jackson]] 10:16, 4 September 2012 (UTC) | ||
:I agree [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 21:21, 4 September 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:21, 4 September 2012
|
Metadata here |
This article was contributed by Peter Jackson as a paragraph in the article on the House of Lords. I moved it to this position with Peter's consent because its length is inconsistent with the format of that article. Nick Gardner 08:15, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
As the government has now officially dropped its reform proposals, I'd say they're not part of the history of the House and I'm going to remove them from this article. Maybe there's somewhere else they can go. Peter Jackson 10:16, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
- I agree Nick Gardner 21:21, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
Categories:
- Developing Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- History Developing Articles
- History Nonstub Articles
- History Internal Articles
- Politics Developing Articles
- Politics Nonstub Articles
- Politics Internal Articles
- History Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Politics Underlinked Articles
- Need def
- History need def
- Politics need def
- Need rel
- History need rel
- Politics need rel
- Need bib
- History need bib
- Politics need bib
- Need ext
- History need ext
- Politics need ext
- History tag