Manuscript peer review/Related Articles: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Daniel Mietchen |
imported>Daniel Mietchen |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
{{r|Public peer review}} | {{r|Public peer review}} | ||
{{r|Post-publication peer review}} | {{r|Post-publication peer review}} | ||
{{r|Book review}} | |||
{{r|Monograph}} | |||
{{r|Book chapter}} | |||
Latest revision as of 08:41, 19 April 2010
Manuscript peer review: A variant of peer review in which scholarly manuscripts are being evaluated; used by academic publishing agencies to decide about formal publication. [e]
This article contains just a definition and optionally other subpages (such as a list of related articles), but no metadata. Create the metadata page if you want to expand this into a full article.
Parent topics
- Research peer review [r]: Evaluation by experts of the quality and pertinence of research or research proposals of other experts in the same field. [e]
- Scholarly publishing [r]: Add brief definition or description
- Academic journal [r]: A regularly-published, peer-reviewed publication that publishes scholarship relating to an academic discipline. [e]
Subtopics
- Journal peer review [r]: The most common variant of manuscript peer review, in which scholarly manuscripts are being evaluated; used by academic publishing agencies to decide about formal publication in academic journals. [e]
- Grant peer review [r]: A variant of peer review in which grant proposals are being evaluated; used by research funding agencies to decide how to distribute their funds. [e]
- Single-blind peer review [r]: The currently most common variant of peer review, in which the reviewers of a scholarly manuscript or grant proposal are informed about the identity of the authors, but not vice versa. [e]
- Double-blind peer review [r]: A variant of peer review in which neither the authors nor the reviewers of a scholarly manuscript or grant proposal are informed about each other's identity. [e]
- Open peer review [r]: A variant of peer review in which the authors of a scholarly manuscript or grant proposal are informed about the identity of the reviewers. [e]
- Public peer review [r]: A variant of peer review in which the evaluation of a scholarly manuscript or grant proposal takes place in public before formal publication. [e]
- Post-publication peer review [r]: Add brief definition or description
- Book review [r]: Add brief definition or description
- Monograph [r]: Add brief definition or description
- Book chapter [r]: Add brief definition or description