Anatomy Lesson of Dr. Nicolaes Tulp: Difference between revisions
imported>Paul Wormer (New page: {{Image|humanAnatomy1.JPG|right|350px|Anatomy Lecture of Dr. Nicolaes Tulp by Rembrandt van Rijn, 1632. Size: 169.5 × 216.5 cm}} The '''Anatomy Lesson of Dr. Nicolaes Tulp''' is a well-k...) |
imported>Paul Wormer No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | |||
{{Image|humanAnatomy1.JPG|right|350px|Anatomy Lecture of Dr. Nicolaes Tulp by | {{Image|humanAnatomy1.JPG|right|350px|Anatomy Lecture of Dr. Nicolaes Tulp by | ||
Rembrandt van Rijn, 1632. Size: 169.5 × 216.5 cm}} | Rembrandt van Rijn, 1632. Size: 169.5 × 216.5 cm}} | ||
The '''Anatomy Lesson of Dr. Nicolaes Tulp''' is a well-known painting of the Dutch artist [[Rembrandt van Rijn]]. The original, dating from 1632, is in the museum ''Mauritshuis'' in [[The Hague]], [[The Netherlands]]. The painting depicts a lecture in [[Human anatomy|anatomy]] delivered by Dr. Nicolaes Tulp to a group of surgeons. The public lecture took place in ''De Waag'' (weighing house) in [[Amsterdam]] | The '''Anatomy Lesson of Dr. Nicolaes Tulp''' is a well-known painting of the Dutch artist [[Rembrandt van Rijn]]. The original, dating from 1632, is in the museum ''Mauritshuis'' in [[The Hague]], [[The Netherlands]]. The painting depicts a lecture in [[Human anatomy|anatomy]] delivered by Dr. Nicolaes Tulp to a group of surgeons. The public lecture took place in ''De Waag'' (weighing house) in [[Amsterdam]]; at that time ''De Waag'' possessed an anatomic theater. It is the first group portrait by the then 26-year old Rembrandt. Depicted are the surgeons: Jacob Blok, Hartman Hartmansz, Adriaan Slabberaan, Jacob de Witt, Matthys Kalkoen, Jacob Koolveld and Frans van Loenen, and of course, the lecturer Dr. Tulp. | ||
The dissected body is that of Adriaan Adriaansz. (alias Aris ’t Kint), who had been hanged earlier that day (January, 1632) because of theft. The Amsterdam Surgeon Guild allowed one public dissection per year and the body that was dissected had to be the remains of an executed criminal. | The dissected body is that of Adriaan Adriaansz. (alias Aris ’t Kint), who had been hanged earlier that day (January, 1632) because of theft. The Amsterdam Surgeon Guild allowed one public dissection per year and the body that was dissected had to be the remains of an executed criminal. | ||
In 1828, when the painting was in the possession of the widow fund of the Surgeon Guild (the Guild itself had been dissolved 1798), it was decided to auction it to support the widow fund with its proceeds.<ref>Claus Volkenandt, ''Rembrandt: Anatomie eines Bildes'', Wilhelm Fink Verlag, Munchen (2004). [http://books.google.nl/books?id=ZSHE5pdwSlsC&pg=PA49&lpg=PA49&dq=anatomische+les+van+dr.+nicolaes+tulp&source=bl&ots=F6zySpeSO-&sig=VlUTkyEUCKhfePXG_PBK8H8NZEo&hl=nl&ei=AwkdS4SGAcrA-Qb_nqndDw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CAgQ6AEwADhk#v=onepage&q=anatomische%20les%20van%20dr.%20nicolaes%20tulp&f=false Google books]</ref> However, the Dutch King [[Willem I]] prohibited the auction of the painting and ordered to buy it for his ''Koninklijk Kabinet van Schilderijen'' (Royal Gallery of Paintings), that was open to the public and had moved a few years earlier (1822) to the ''Mauritshuis''. | In 1828, when the painting was in the possession of the widow fund of the Surgeon Guild (the Guild itself had been dissolved 1798), it was decided to auction it to support the widow fund with its proceeds.<ref>Claus Volkenandt, ''Rembrandt: Anatomie eines Bildes'', Wilhelm Fink Verlag, Munchen (2004). [http://books.google.nl/books?id=ZSHE5pdwSlsC&pg=PA49&lpg=PA49&dq=anatomische+les+van+dr.+nicolaes+tulp&source=bl&ots=F6zySpeSO-&sig=VlUTkyEUCKhfePXG_PBK8H8NZEo&hl=nl&ei=AwkdS4SGAcrA-Qb_nqndDw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CAgQ6AEwADhk#v=onepage&q=anatomische%20les%20van%20dr.%20nicolaes%20tulp&f=false Google books]</ref> However, the Dutch King [[Willem I]] prohibited the auction of the painting and ordered to buy it for his ''Koninklijk Kabinet van Schilderijen'' (Royal Gallery of Paintings), that was open to the public and had moved a few years earlier (1822) to the ''Mauritshuis''. The painting was bought for 32,000 dfl. | ||
In 2006 the left lower arm of a cadaver of a 41-year white male was dissected and photographs were made of the different stages of the the dissection | In 2006 the left lower arm of a cadaver of a 41-year white male was dissected and photographs were made of the different stages of the the dissection that were compared with the painting. It was found that the anatomical characteristics of the painting could not be reproduced.<ref>F.F.A. IJpma, R.C. van de Graaf, J-P.A. Nicolai, and M.F. Meek, | ||
''De anatomische les van dr. Nicolaes Tulp door Rembrandt (1632) en de bevindingen bij de dissectie van de onderarm van een kadaver: anatomische discrepanties'' [The anatomy lecture of Dr. Nicolaes Tulp by Rembrandt (1632) and the findings at the dissections of the lower arm of a cadaver: anotomical dsicrepancies.] Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde vol. '''150''' pp. 2756–2765 (2006) (in Dutch) [http://www.ntvg.nl/node/311917/print Online]</ref> | ''De anatomische les van dr. Nicolaes Tulp door Rembrandt (1632) en de bevindingen bij de dissectie van de onderarm van een kadaver: anatomische discrepanties'' [The anatomy lecture of Dr. Nicolaes Tulp by Rembrandt (1632) and the findings at the dissections of the lower arm of a cadaver: anotomical dsicrepancies.] Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde vol. '''150''' pp. 2756–2765 (2006) (in Dutch) [http://www.ntvg.nl/node/311917/print Online]</ref> | ||
<ref>F.F. A. IJpma, R. C. van de Graaf, J.-P. A. Nicolai, and M. F. Meek, ''The Anatomy Lesson of Dr. Nicolaes Tulp by Rembrandt (1632): A Comparison of the Painting With a Dissected Left Forearm of a Dutch Male Cadaver'', The Journal of Hand Surgery, Vol. '''31''', pp. 882-891 (2006) [http://www.jhandsurg.org/article/S0363-5023%2806%2900293-0/abstract On line abstract]</ref> | <ref>F.F. A. IJpma, R. C. van de Graaf, J.-P. A. Nicolai, and M. F. Meek, ''The Anatomy Lesson of Dr. Nicolaes Tulp by Rembrandt (1632): A Comparison of the Painting With a Dissected Left Forearm of a Dutch Male Cadaver'', The Journal of Hand Surgery, Vol. '''31''', pp. 882-891 (2006) [http://www.jhandsurg.org/article/S0363-5023%2806%2900293-0/abstract On line abstract]</ref> | ||
Line 15: | Line 17: | ||
http://www.mauritshuis.nl/index.aspx?siteid=40 | http://www.mauritshuis.nl/index.aspx?siteid=40 | ||
== | ==References== | ||
<references /> | <references /> | ||
W. S. Heckscher, ''Rembrandt's Anatomy of Dr. Tulp. An Iconological Study'', New York University Press (1958). |
Revision as of 09:03, 7 December 2009
The Anatomy Lesson of Dr. Nicolaes Tulp is a well-known painting of the Dutch artist Rembrandt van Rijn. The original, dating from 1632, is in the museum Mauritshuis in The Hague, The Netherlands. The painting depicts a lecture in anatomy delivered by Dr. Nicolaes Tulp to a group of surgeons. The public lecture took place in De Waag (weighing house) in Amsterdam; at that time De Waag possessed an anatomic theater. It is the first group portrait by the then 26-year old Rembrandt. Depicted are the surgeons: Jacob Blok, Hartman Hartmansz, Adriaan Slabberaan, Jacob de Witt, Matthys Kalkoen, Jacob Koolveld and Frans van Loenen, and of course, the lecturer Dr. Tulp.
The dissected body is that of Adriaan Adriaansz. (alias Aris ’t Kint), who had been hanged earlier that day (January, 1632) because of theft. The Amsterdam Surgeon Guild allowed one public dissection per year and the body that was dissected had to be the remains of an executed criminal.
In 1828, when the painting was in the possession of the widow fund of the Surgeon Guild (the Guild itself had been dissolved 1798), it was decided to auction it to support the widow fund with its proceeds.[1] However, the Dutch King Willem I prohibited the auction of the painting and ordered to buy it for his Koninklijk Kabinet van Schilderijen (Royal Gallery of Paintings), that was open to the public and had moved a few years earlier (1822) to the Mauritshuis. The painting was bought for 32,000 dfl.
In 2006 the left lower arm of a cadaver of a 41-year white male was dissected and photographs were made of the different stages of the the dissection that were compared with the painting. It was found that the anatomical characteristics of the painting could not be reproduced.[2] [3]
External link
http://www.mauritshuis.nl/index.aspx?siteid=40
References
- ↑ Claus Volkenandt, Rembrandt: Anatomie eines Bildes, Wilhelm Fink Verlag, Munchen (2004). Google books
- ↑ F.F.A. IJpma, R.C. van de Graaf, J-P.A. Nicolai, and M.F. Meek, De anatomische les van dr. Nicolaes Tulp door Rembrandt (1632) en de bevindingen bij de dissectie van de onderarm van een kadaver: anatomische discrepanties [The anatomy lecture of Dr. Nicolaes Tulp by Rembrandt (1632) and the findings at the dissections of the lower arm of a cadaver: anotomical dsicrepancies.] Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde vol. 150 pp. 2756–2765 (2006) (in Dutch) Online
- ↑ F.F. A. IJpma, R. C. van de Graaf, J.-P. A. Nicolai, and M. F. Meek, The Anatomy Lesson of Dr. Nicolaes Tulp by Rembrandt (1632): A Comparison of the Painting With a Dissected Left Forearm of a Dutch Male Cadaver, The Journal of Hand Surgery, Vol. 31, pp. 882-891 (2006) On line abstract
W. S. Heckscher, Rembrandt's Anatomy of Dr. Tulp. An Iconological Study, New York University Press (1958).