Talk:Colombia History: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Bruce M. Tindall mNo edit summary |
imported>Russell D. Jones (→Rename to "Colombia, history"?: suggestion) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{Rename}} | {{Rename}} | ||
== Rename? == | |||
What is the standard way to name history articles? Isn't it "Name_of_country, history"? ''<small>Comment added 23:30, November 3, 2008 by [[User:Bruce M. Tindall|Bruce M. Tindall]]</small>'' | |||
:The article should be renamed to [[history of Colombia]]. [[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] 18:38, 24 September 2013 (UTC) | |||
==Clean-up== | |||
I removed the following from the "Colonial Period" section because I just can not make sense of it: [[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] 17:51, 24 September 2013 (UTC) | |||
<blockquote>The 17th century had several revolutions and [[Europe]] and [[North America]] that would have influence in the growing Colombian nationalism. </blockquote> |
Latest revision as of 12:38, 24 September 2013
Rename?
What is the standard way to name history articles? Isn't it "Name_of_country, history"? Comment added 23:30, November 3, 2008 by Bruce M. Tindall
- The article should be renamed to history of Colombia. Russell D. Jones 18:38, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
Clean-up
I removed the following from the "Colonial Period" section because I just can not make sense of it: Russell D. Jones 17:51, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
The 17th century had several revolutions and Europe and North America that would have influence in the growing Colombian nationalism.