Destroyer: Difference between revisions
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz No edit summary |
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Initial usage== | ==Initial usage== | ||
When the modern self-propelled [[torpedo]] was invented, in 1866, by Robert Whitehead, it was initially added to conventional warships, but navies soon realized that a small, fast craft, with a main battery of torpedoes, could threaten much larger warships such as [[battleship]]s. The battleship of the early 20th century was the largest, most heavily armed, and most heavily protected warship type, but relatively slow and not extremely maneuverable. | When the modern self-propelled [[torpedo]] was invented, in 1866, by Robert Whitehead, it was initially added to conventional warships, but navies soon realized that a small, fast craft, with a main battery of torpedoes, could threaten much larger warships such as [[battleship]]s. The [[battleship]] of the early 20th century was the largest, most heavily armed, and most heavily protected warship type, but relatively slow and not extremely maneuverable. | ||
Torpedo boats were generally not capable of long-range steaming or being seaworthy in the "blue water" deep ocean; they were coastal craft. When battleships and other large ships, possibly escorting unarmed cargo and troop transports, needed to approach a hostile shore, they needed to deal with the torpedo boat threat. A partial solution was adding a secondary gun battery of smaller [[caliber]], faster firing rate, and faster aiming than the main guns intended to sink other battleships, but the secondary battery still let the torpedo boats come too close. | Torpedo boats were generally not capable of long-range steaming or being seaworthy in the "blue water" deep ocean; they were coastal craft. When battleships and other large ships, possibly escorting unarmed cargo and troop transports, needed to approach a hostile shore, they needed to deal with the torpedo boat threat. A partial solution was adding a secondary gun battery of smaller [[caliber]], faster firing rate, and faster aiming than the main guns intended to sink other battleships, but the secondary battery still let the torpedo boats come too close. | ||
A new type of vessel, called the '''torpedo boat destroyer''', was developed as an escort to major warships, and possibly merchant vessels threatened by torpedo boats. Such vessels had to be large enough to accompany a battleship on its journey through the blue oceans of the world, but small, fast, and maneuverable enough to pursue and destroy torpedo boats. | A new type of vessel, called the '''torpedo boat destroyer''', was developed as an escort to major warships, and possibly merchant vessels threatened by torpedo boats. Such vessels had to be large enough to accompany a battleship on its journey through the blue oceans of the world, but small, fast, and maneuverable enough to pursue and destroy torpedo boats. | ||
Line 79: | Line 80: | ||
*Long Lance torpedo | *Long Lance torpedo | ||
Small boys or not, sometimes one must grow up very quickly. In what has been called the most gallant action in the history of the U.S. Navy, the [[World War II, Pacific#Center: Action off Samar|Action off Samar]] during the [[Battle of Leyte Gulf]], communications errors and wishful thinking on the part of a senior commander left a small force as the screen between the vulnerable transports of the invasion force and a powerful Japanese surface force led by the world's biggest battleship, ''IJN Yamato''. Seven destroyers and destroyer escorts, with backup from aircraft not armed for attacking warships, challenged four battleships, eight cruisers, and eleven destroyers &mdash and turned the Japanese force back, sinking three heavy cruisers and badly damaging another, and protecting the landing force. ''USS Hoel, Johnston'' and ''Samuel B. Roberts'' sank and the other four were seriously damaged. | Small boys or not, sometimes one must grow up very quickly. Some boys aged very fast at the largest naval engagement in history, the [[Battle of Leyte Gulf]]. | ||
The old torpedo boat destroyers were meant to protect battleships, but, at the [[World War II, Pacific#South: Battle of Surigao Strait|Battle of Surigao Strait]], roles were reversed. U.S. PT boats harassed a Japanese battleship task force, but then squadrons of destroyers swarmed in with torpedo attacks, blowing ''IJN Fuso'' in half, and crippling ''IJN Yamashiro'' to be sunk by U.S. battleships. Some of those battleships, in the last battleship vs. battleship engagement there was ever to be, had crawled out of the mud of Pearl Harbor to take their revenge — after the boys had softened the opposition for their fathers. | |||
In what has been called the most gallant action in the history of the U.S. Navy, the [[World War II, Pacific#Center: Action off Samar|Action off Samar]] during the [[Battle of Leyte Gulf]], communications errors and wishful thinking on the part of a senior commander left a small force as the screen between the vulnerable transports of the invasion force and a powerful Japanese surface force led by the world's biggest battleship, ''IJN Yamato''. Seven destroyers and destroyer escorts, with backup from aircraft not armed for attacking warships, challenged four battleships, eight cruisers, and eleven destroyers &mdash and turned the Japanese force back, sinking three heavy cruisers and badly damaging another, and protecting the landing force. ''USS Hoel, Johnston'' and ''Samuel B. Roberts'' sank and the other four were seriously damaged. | |||
===Support to amphibious warfare=== | ===Support to amphibious warfare=== | ||
Revision as of 00:38, 19 July 2008
A destroyer is a type of warship, the nature of which has evolved since it first came into use, roughly at the beginning of the twentieth century. Several other warship designations have, at different times and in different navies, overlapped the "destroyer" role. Most common among these roles are cruiser and frigate. Another type of vessel, whose nomenclature is intertwined with the origin of "destroyer", has been called "torpedo boat", "patrol torpedo (PT)", among other terms.
Initial usage
When the modern self-propelled torpedo was invented, in 1866, by Robert Whitehead, it was initially added to conventional warships, but navies soon realized that a small, fast craft, with a main battery of torpedoes, could threaten much larger warships such as battleships. The battleship of the early 20th century was the largest, most heavily armed, and most heavily protected warship type, but relatively slow and not extremely maneuverable.
Torpedo boats were generally not capable of long-range steaming or being seaworthy in the "blue water" deep ocean; they were coastal craft. When battleships and other large ships, possibly escorting unarmed cargo and troop transports, needed to approach a hostile shore, they needed to deal with the torpedo boat threat. A partial solution was adding a secondary gun battery of smaller caliber, faster firing rate, and faster aiming than the main guns intended to sink other battleships, but the secondary battery still let the torpedo boats come too close.
A new type of vessel, called the torpedo boat destroyer, was developed as an escort to major warships, and possibly merchant vessels threatened by torpedo boats. Such vessels had to be large enough to accompany a battleship on its journey through the blue oceans of the world, but small, fast, and maneuverable enough to pursue and destroy torpedo boats.
First evolution
It soon became obvious that the torpedo boat destroyer was a useful vessel for a wide range of applications, such as convoy escort, so the specialized designation became the simple destroyer. Ironically, while the first destroyers were armed only with quick-firing guns, usually of several calibers from medium to light, navies started equipping destroyers with torpedoes, as the weapon of choice if they did need to confront battleships. For simplicity, the category of "cruiser" is not being included in this immediate discussion; simply assume they were vessels of intermediate characteristics between battleshps and destroyers.
First World War, and a new torpedo threat
The pure torpedo boat was becoming less popular around the start of the First World War, although variants would keep returning. Torpedoes, however, were still a real threat, but from submarines rather than surface vessels.
Technology for finding submerged submarines lagged the introduction of the undersea weapons, and was quite primitive and short-ranged. In general, the first antisubmarine sensors were passive listening devices, called hydrophones. Putting hydrophones on many destroyers allowed an antisubmarine screen to be formed around the "high-value assets", the vessels the submarines had as primary targets.
Once a submerged submarine was located, location being a very loose term at the time, the destroyer needed some way to attack it. Clearly, guns that could blow a surface torpedo boat out of the water were not the answer, since they cannot shoot at underwater targets. The first antisubmarine weapons were depth charges, or containers of explosives that would be dropped, from the surface, over the location of a suspected submarine, and would detonate when they reached a preset depth. The submarine's depth was even harder to determine than its range and bearing (distance) from the destroyer; it was estimated based on the strength of the sound, knowledge of the bottom depth and water characteristics, and a seaman's judgment.
By 1918, however, an active sound-based technique, code-named ASDIC for an apparently nonexistent "Allied Submarine Detection Investigation Committee" was mounted on several British and U.S. destroyers. It came too late for combat use in the First World War, but development actively continued. The more common term became sonar, for "sound detection and ranging". In modern intelligence terminology, active and passive sound-based systems were the acoustic MASINT or acoustic intelligence of geophysical measurement and signal intelligence.
Yet more torpedoes, and things that carried them
By the Second World War, aircraft could drop torpedoes, as well as use weapons including machine guns and bombs. In its evolving role as an escort, as well as being a general-purpose craft for independent assignments, the destroyer now needed to add anti-aircraft warfare to its anti-submarine warfare and anti-surface warfare roles.
Often, the generic radio call sign for U.S. destroyers was "small boys". Indeed, destroyers were small beside the aircraft carriers and the impressive but obsolete battleships. Arleigh Burke, a noted destroyer unit leader in WWII, is, ironically, the namesake for today's Burke-class destroyers. When a Burke-class vessel can shoot cruise missiles at land targets 1000 miles away, fire surface-to-air missiles at aircraft 100 miles away (and tracked farther away), and even may "shoot a bullet with a bullet" in ballistic missile defense, the small boys have grown up.[1] There are, however, emerging new warship types that may take on the role.
Antisubmarine evolution
- hedgehog
- subtypes: destroyer escort, corvette, sloop, frigate
General detection
Antiaircraft evolution
Aircraft, with ever-increasing performance, were more and more of a threat. The initial machine guns quickly proved to have insufficient range and stopping power to be useful, although some .50 caliber or comparable heavy machine guns were retained for final use, and perhaps for attacking boats or to threaten ships with little or no armament. Against non-kamikaze aircraft, the various weapons systems had significantly different effectiveness[2] While some earlier studies showed the .50 caliber as having shot down some aircraft, serious analysis showed that the 20mm Oerlikon autocannon was the lightest weapon with significant kill probability.
#aircraft | 20mm Oerlikon | 40mm Bofors | 5"/38 non-proximity | 5"/38 proximity fuze |
---|---|---|---|---|
41 | 30,100 | 4,500 | 1,000 | 550 |
None, however, were as great a threat as the Japanese kamikaze, essentially the first autonomous anti-shipping missile. The guidance system of these missiles, however, was not electronic, but a human pilot who would die as he crashed the aircraft into its target ship. It was no longer enough to disable the aircraft a distance away from the ship; the destroyer had to force the kamikaze to crash into the sea. Once the kamikaze was in the final approach, even killing the pilot might not stop it from hitting; the final defense had to have sufficient energy to divert the aircraft from its final course.
#aircraft | 20mm Oerlikon | 40mm Bofors | 5"/38 non-proximity | 5"/38 proximity fuze |
---|---|---|---|---|
24 | 27,200 | 6,000 | 1,000 | 200 |
The problem was not firepower alone, but also fire control. Ideally, a destroyer could engage kamikazes with 5" guns, equipped with proximity fuzes. These guns had the greatest range and killing power, and best integration with the CIC and radar.
Surface warfare evolution
- Destroyer leader
- Long Lance torpedo
Small boys or not, sometimes one must grow up very quickly. Some boys aged very fast at the largest naval engagement in history, the Battle of Leyte Gulf.
The old torpedo boat destroyers were meant to protect battleships, but, at the Battle of Surigao Strait, roles were reversed. U.S. PT boats harassed a Japanese battleship task force, but then squadrons of destroyers swarmed in with torpedo attacks, blowing IJN Fuso in half, and crippling IJN Yamashiro to be sunk by U.S. battleships. Some of those battleships, in the last battleship vs. battleship engagement there was ever to be, had crawled out of the mud of Pearl Harbor to take their revenge — after the boys had softened the opposition for their fathers.
In what has been called the most gallant action in the history of the U.S. Navy, the Action off Samar during the Battle of Leyte Gulf, communications errors and wishful thinking on the part of a senior commander left a small force as the screen between the vulnerable transports of the invasion force and a powerful Japanese surface force led by the world's biggest battleship, IJN Yamato. Seven destroyers and destroyer escorts, with backup from aircraft not armed for attacking warships, challenged four battleships, eight cruisers, and eleven destroyers &mdash and turned the Japanese force back, sinking three heavy cruisers and badly damaging another, and protecting the landing force. USS Hoel, Johnston and Samuel B. Roberts sank and the other four were seriously damaged.
Support to amphibious warfare
Information-centric warfare
Still in WWII, the destroyer, along with other warships, began to regard information as a weapon. The captain of a destroyer might be more effective in combat not on high on the bridge, relying on his eyes and ears, but in a combat information center, where lookout reports, sonar, radar, radio messages, and other data could be fused onto tactical charts.
The dawn of guided missiles
Destroyers and cruisers were the first warships, in most navies, to be equipped with guided missiles. The initial installations were usually surface-to-air missiles, sometimes with a secondary surface attack capability.
Dedicated surface-to-surface missiles, specifically anti-shipping missiles intended for use against targets surrounded by water, revived the concept of the "eggshell with a sledgehammer", or small fast vessel with a powerful offensive weapon. In the revival, however, the sledgehammer was the naval surface-to-surface missile (SSM).
In the first combat use of an anti-shipping SSM, Egyptian Osa-class missile boats, of Soviet design and construction, sank the Israeli Navy flagship, the destroyer Eilat during the 1967 Arab-Israeli War. The Osas used P-15 Termit (NATO reporting name SS-N-2 STYX) missiles.
Modern destroyers
Even now, the role changes. A Burke-class destroyer of the U.S. or Japanese navies still has a 5" gun and smaller autocannon, but its main battery is a vertical launch system that can fire a variety of precision-guided munitions. The latest "flight 2B" Burkes also have a pair of helicopters, and the AEGIS battle management system. The vessel has the displacement of a WWII light cruiser.
Anti-air warfare
This is the most potent mission on modern destroyers, although its surface-to-air missiles usually have a secondary surface-to-surface capability, and the same launchers used for the SAMs can fire surface-to-underwater missiles and surface-to-surface missiles.
Anti-submarine warfare
Given that the most potent torpedoes are now on submarines, not surface ships, a destroyer will want to engage a submarine at a considerable distance. If the destroyer carries an antisubmarine helicopter, the role of the ship may be to support the helicopter, with sensors and refueling. The kill mechanism would be lightweight torpedoes dropped from the helicopter.
If the destroyer has a long-range surface-to-underwater missile that will fly through the air and drop a homing torpedo in the predicted vicinity of the submarine, it may be just as much a threat as the helicopter. Indeed, the helicopter may emphasize its sensors for finding the submarine and letting the destroyer's SUMs kill it.
Destroyers have non-missile carried torpedoes, but these are last-resort weapons, generally to kill a submarine that has already fired torpedoes that will kill the destroyers. The new Russian torpedoes of extremely high, even supersonic, speed may put a new dimension on this tactical scenario.
Anti-surface warfare
Different navies give their destroyers different priorities. The later Burke class have done away with their pure Harpoon anti-shipping missiles, but the Russian Sovremenny class and the Chinese equivalent carry the very potent Moskit (NATO designation SS-N-22 SUNBURN).
Although its mission is no longer primarily surface warfare, it could give a WWII battleship a very hard time with its RIM-66 Standard missiles in surface-to-surface mode, using over-the-horizon targeting. A 13.5" diameter missile, of a weight depending on how much fuel it consumed, traveling at Mach 3.5, would have more kinetic energy than a traditional battleship shell, to say nothing of a substantial high-explosive warhead and burning fuel.
Support to land operations
- cruise missile
- new generation guns, including advanced gun systems and futures such as vertical gun systems and railguns
Where do new types fit?
While the Zumwalt-class destroyer experimental follow-ons to the Burkes have grown to 14,000 ton vessels, [3] under names such as littoral combat ship and "Streetfighter", roles are being defined for smaller vessels that may be the "small boys" of the future. These boys will play in a different neighborhood than their fathers and grandfathers, who were designed to operate in the "blue water" of the deep ocean. Coastal areas, with confined areas such as the Strait of Hormuz, Strait of Malacca, and Taiwan Straits, form the "green water" littoral, with different requirements for sensors and weapons.
References
- ↑ Marfiak, Thomas (May 2008), "Where Are the Ballistic-Missile-Defense Cruisers?", U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings
- ↑ Jennings, Ed (01 February 2001), Crosley's Secret War Effort: The Proximity Fuze
- ↑ DDG-1000 Zumwalt / DD(X) /Multi-Mission Surface Combatant / Future Surface Combatant