Biophysics/Bibliography: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Daniel Mietchen
(started)
 
imported>Daniel Mietchen
(+one)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
*{{CZ:Ref:Zhou 2011 What is biophysics?}}
*{{CZ:Ref:DOI:10.1186/1745-6150-2-30}}
:{{CZ:Ref:DOI:10.1186/1745-6150-2-30/Review1/Quote1}}
*{{cite journal
*{{cite journal
  | author = Mielczarek, E.V.
  | author = Mielczarek, E.V.
Line 13: Line 16:
  | year = 2002
  | year = 2002
  | title = Biological physics--origin and perspectives.
  | title = Biological physics--origin and perspectives.
  | journal = Chemphyschem
  | journal = Chem. Phys. Chem.
  | volume = 3
  | volume = 3
  | issue = 3
  | issue = 3

Latest revision as of 19:28, 4 March 2011

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
A list of key readings about Biophysics.
Please sort and annotate in a user-friendly manner. For formatting, consider using automated reference wikification.
Perhaps best appreciated by reading the reviews first, which are publicly available.
First paragraph of Eugene Koonin's review (published alongside with the paper, as is custom at Biology Direct):

"This is an ambitious, even super-ambitious paper. The subject is, no more, no less, the change of the very character of modern biology that, according to Rose and Oakley, has taken place (or, perhaps, is still taking place) at the end of the 20th and the beginning of the 21st centuries. I think the authors are, generally, correct in their claim that such a crucial transformation of biology, indeed, has occurred. Many biologists, of course, intuit this change but few seem to rationalize it. Therefore, this is, potentially, a paper of unusual importance, perhaps, an eye opener of sorts to many."