Talk:Battleship: Difference between revisions
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz (New page: {{subpages}}) |
imported>Russell D. Jones (Just how big is big?) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
==[[Battleship/Definition]]== | |||
Howard, isn't this definition redundant? | |||
::"'''A heavily-armored''', warship optimized for fighting other warships using large-caliber guns; '''certain armor requirements''' differentiated from cruisers; obsolete by end of [[World War II]]." | |||
Yes, tonnage plays a role in the definition of a battleship. To my way of thinking, a battleship is a heavy, all-big-gun ship ''descendant in design'' from the [[HMS ''Dreadnought'']]. We don't need to get an all inclusive definition (some were fast some were slow; and then there was the Battlecruiser variant, and the pocket battleship), but one that covers just the essentials. And, yes, there was a universal naval doctrine that like ships fight like ships. And come to think of it, some battleships just didn't have the armor (HMS ''Lion'' comes to mind); or were these classified as battlecruisers? And then there was the USS ''Alaska'' and ''Guam''; the ''Graf Spee'' and sisters. Hey, I just thought about the Dictionary of American Fighting Ships. How do they define a battleship? [[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] 19:17, 18 August 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:17, 18 August 2009
Battleship/Definition
Howard, isn't this definition redundant?
- "A heavily-armored, warship optimized for fighting other warships using large-caliber guns; certain armor requirements differentiated from cruisers; obsolete by end of World War II."
Yes, tonnage plays a role in the definition of a battleship. To my way of thinking, a battleship is a heavy, all-big-gun ship descendant in design from the HMS ''Dreadnought''. We don't need to get an all inclusive definition (some were fast some were slow; and then there was the Battlecruiser variant, and the pocket battleship), but one that covers just the essentials. And, yes, there was a universal naval doctrine that like ships fight like ships. And come to think of it, some battleships just didn't have the armor (HMS Lion comes to mind); or were these classified as battlecruisers? And then there was the USS Alaska and Guam; the Graf Spee and sisters. Hey, I just thought about the Dictionary of American Fighting Ships. How do they define a battleship? Russell D. Jones 19:17, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
- Article with Definition
- Military Category Check
- Engineering Category Check
- Developed Articles
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Military Developed Articles
- Military Advanced Articles
- Military Nonstub Articles
- Military Internal Articles
- Engineering Developed Articles
- Engineering Advanced Articles
- Engineering Nonstub Articles
- Engineering Internal Articles
- Military tag
- Technology tag