Fighter aircraft: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
Line 33: Line 33:
Several aircraft have significantly advanced electronics, maneuverability, or other features when compared to the basic fourth generation. Examples include the French [[Rafale]] and the U.S. [[F-18 Super Hornet]].
Several aircraft have significantly advanced electronics, maneuverability, or other features when compared to the basic fourth generation. Examples include the French [[Rafale]] and the U.S. [[F-18 Super Hornet]].
===Fifth generation===
===Fifth generation===
Aircraft of the current generation are more revolutionary than evolutionary, the example most often cited being the U.S. [[F-22 Raptor]]. They have low observability (i.e., stealth), supercruise, extremely advanced electronics including [[radar#active electronically scanned array|radars with no moving parts and low probability of intercept]], and may have supercruise, the ability to fly at supersonic speed without an afterburner. The U.S. [[F-35 Lightning II]] does not have supercruise, but is better at ground attack than the F-22, and also has short-takeoff versions. Russian technology here is emerging, but the [[Su-47]] may be of this generation.
Aircraft of the current generation are more revolutionary than evolutionary, the example most often cited being the U.S. [[F-22 Raptor]]. They have low observability (i.e., stealth), supercruise, extremely advanced [[avionics]] including [[radar#active electronically scanned array|extremely flexible AESA radars low probability of intercept]], and may have supercruise, the ability to fly at supersonic speed without an afterburner.  
 
While it is not stealthy and does not have supercruise, the [[F-18 Super Hornet]], especially the Block 30/Super Hornet II+ has avionics comparable to the F-22
 
The U.S. [[F-35 Lightning II]] does not have supercruise, but is better at ground attack than the F-22, and also has short-takeoff versions. Russian technology here is emerging, but the [[Su-47]] may be of this generation.
 
==References==
==References==
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}

Revision as of 00:03, 25 July 2008

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

A fighter aircraft generally is a fast and maneuverable aircraft, whose capabilities include attacking other aircraft. There are a variety of missions, and many fighters are best at one but can do others. A few multirole fighters truly do all jobs well, although a specialized aircrat may be superior for a specific mission.

Jet-propelled fighters are classed in "generations".

Fighter missions

Within a given generation, there may be specific fighters optimized for a particular mission.

Air superiority fighter

Optimized for engaging and destroying other fighter aircraft, often at long range. While it was limited to gun range, the F-86 Sabre was one such aircraft, while the F-15 Eagle is an advanced air superiority fighter, allegedly developed with the motto "not a pound for air to ground" (see F-15E Strike Eagle)

Interceptor

Interceptors may be short- or long-range. Short-ranged interceptors, such as the MiG-21, protect relatively small areas. Long-range interceptors, such as the MiG-25 or F-102 often are optimized for destroying enemy bombers far from their target. Interceptors are purely defensive (i.e., defensive counter-air), while air superiority fighters can be offensive or defensive.

Fighter-bomber

This type is optimized for attacking ground targets. Depending on the specific type, it may have relatively more or less ability to engage in air-to-air combat. Some aircraft designated as "fighters" have no air-to-air capability, such as the F-117 Nighthawk, which is really a light bomber. Other fighter-bombers, such as the F-105, do have some air combat capability, but generally would concentrate on the attack mission, perhaps relying on speed to avoid interceptors.

Multirole fighter

While almost all fighters have, at one time, been used in both ground attack and air-to-air combat, a true multirole fighter does both well. Historically, when a reasonably versatile fighter-bomber such as the F-4 Phantom II met other fighters, it jettisoned its bombload to gain maneuvering performance. Forcing the aircraft to jettison its bombs far from the target defeated its primary mission.

More recent aircraft, however, have demonstrated true multirole capability. In 1991, during Operation Desert Storm, U.S. Navy F-18 Hornet aircraft, assigned to attack a ground target, were intercepted by Iraqi fighters. Without jettisoning their bombload, the Hornets shot down the other aircraft, and completed their attack mission. The F-15E Strike Eagle also can perform at this level.

Fighter generations

The idea of a fighter generation is useful only for approximate comparison of fighters.

First-generation

The first generation of jet fighters were subsonic, armed with machine guns or autocannon for air-to-air combat, and had limited electronics. While there were earlier models, such as the Second World War German Me-262, U.S. F-80 Shooting Star and British Meteor, the most common examples are the Korean War-vintage U.S. F-86 Sabre and Soviet Mig-15/NATO reporting name FAGOT.

Second generation

Typified by the Soviet MiG-17/NATO reporting name FRESCO and U.S. F-100 Super Sabre, these were the first supersonic fighters, typically with limited onboard radar, and both guns and early air-to-air missiles (e.g., AIM-9 Sidewinder).

Third generation

In this generation were the first serious attempts at multirole capability, such as the F-4 Phantom II, originally developed by the U.S. Navy but operated by a large number of countries. An early Soviet design with multirole capability was the MiG-23/NATO reporting name FLOGGER.

Fourth generation

Fighters of this vintage had major advances in electronics and missiles. While each previous generation had been faster than the one before it, fourth generation fighters emphasized maneuverability, missiles that could attack from any angle, and long range. Soviet fighters of this generation include the Su-27/NATO reporting name FLANKER and MiG-29/NATO reporting name FULCRUM. U.S. equivalents split into "high-end" and "low-end", the high end, such as the F-15 Eagle initially optimized for air superiority, and the low-end, such as the F-16 Fighting Falcon, as multirole.

Generation 4.5

Several aircraft have significantly advanced electronics, maneuverability, or other features when compared to the basic fourth generation. Examples include the French Rafale and the U.S. F-18 Super Hornet.

Fifth generation

Aircraft of the current generation are more revolutionary than evolutionary, the example most often cited being the U.S. F-22 Raptor. They have low observability (i.e., stealth), supercruise, extremely advanced avionics including extremely flexible AESA radars low probability of intercept, and may have supercruise, the ability to fly at supersonic speed without an afterburner.

While it is not stealthy and does not have supercruise, the F-18 Super Hornet, especially the Block 30/Super Hornet II+ has avionics comparable to the F-22

The U.S. F-35 Lightning II does not have supercruise, but is better at ground attack than the F-22, and also has short-takeoff versions. Russian technology here is emerging, but the Su-47 may be of this generation.

References