CZ:Approval of CZ namespace pages: Difference between revisions
imported>Larry Sanger m (CZ:Approval for CZ pages moved to CZ:Approval of CZ namespace pages: Add "namespace" in order to make it clear we're not talking about CZ articles, but only about CZ: namespace pages) |
imported>Gareth Leng No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Approval for CZ pages''' | '''Approval for CZ pages''' | ||
CZ: pages may be approved by members of the | CZ: pages may be approved by members of the Management Council or Editorial Council, and once approved a draft page is open to revise, giving two versions, a formally approved version, and an evolving draft alternative. Very few CZ: pages will need to be approved in this way; but some that express important rules or policy statements, need to have a stable form if they are to be useful. At the same time, the draft page can become a way of suggesting significant changes, open to anyone, without fear of disrupting established practices. | ||
==Process== | ==Process== | ||
A member of | A member of either Council places a "ToApprove" template on the article's talk page, and on the Talk page, explains why an approved version is needed or desirable. That template will be marked with a date, usually several days to a week from the date that it is placed. | ||
If the approval template remains there, approval will occur on that date. Meanwhile, discussion and edits continue. Edits at this stage should be made only by | If the approval template remains there, approval will occur on that date. Meanwhile, discussion and edits continue. Edits at this stage should be made only by Council members, and relevant parties (e.g. constables). Other members of Citizendium should make recommendations and criticisms on the talk page. | ||
At least one other member of | At least one other member of either Council must support approval. If another member of either Council objects to approval, then he or she should explain why on the talk page, and further views sought. | ||
If the nominator notes that the discussion on the talk page that has occurred since the nomination for approval brings up important objections, then he or she may delay the date for approval to allow for work to continue. The nominator may also change the version nominated for approval on the "to approve" template to an updated draft. Unless the template is removed, on the designated date, a sysop then freezes the approved version of the article under an Approved template. At that freeze, a draft form of the article is generated. This draft is open to edits as are all unapproved articles on the wiki. After approval, copyediting and minor changes may be performed by any member of | If the nominator notes that the discussion on the talk page that has occurred since the nomination for approval brings up important objections, then he or she may delay the date for approval to allow for work to continue. The nominator may also change the version nominated for approval on the "to approve" template to an updated draft. Unless the template is removed, on the designated date, a sysop then freezes the approved version of the article under an Approved template. At that freeze, a draft form of the article is generated. This draft is open to edits as are all unapproved articles on the wiki. After approval, copyediting and minor changes may be performed by any member of either Council. This may occur at any time. | ||
{{Organization}} | {{Organization}} | ||
Revision as of 07:56, 8 December 2010
Approval for CZ pages
CZ: pages may be approved by members of the Management Council or Editorial Council, and once approved a draft page is open to revise, giving two versions, a formally approved version, and an evolving draft alternative. Very few CZ: pages will need to be approved in this way; but some that express important rules or policy statements, need to have a stable form if they are to be useful. At the same time, the draft page can become a way of suggesting significant changes, open to anyone, without fear of disrupting established practices.
Process
A member of either Council places a "ToApprove" template on the article's talk page, and on the Talk page, explains why an approved version is needed or desirable. That template will be marked with a date, usually several days to a week from the date that it is placed.
If the approval template remains there, approval will occur on that date. Meanwhile, discussion and edits continue. Edits at this stage should be made only by Council members, and relevant parties (e.g. constables). Other members of Citizendium should make recommendations and criticisms on the talk page.
At least one other member of either Council must support approval. If another member of either Council objects to approval, then he or she should explain why on the talk page, and further views sought.
If the nominator notes that the discussion on the talk page that has occurred since the nomination for approval brings up important objections, then he or she may delay the date for approval to allow for work to continue. The nominator may also change the version nominated for approval on the "to approve" template to an updated draft. Unless the template is removed, on the designated date, a sysop then freezes the approved version of the article under an Approved template. At that freeze, a draft form of the article is generated. This draft is open to edits as are all unapproved articles on the wiki. After approval, copyediting and minor changes may be performed by any member of either Council. This may occur at any time.
| Citizendium Organization | ||
|---|---|---|
| CZ:Home | Workgroups | Personnel | Governance | Proposals | Recruitment | Contact | Donate | FAQ | Sitemap |
|width=10% align=center style="background:#F5F5F5"| |}