Talk:Focke-Wulf Fw-190: Difference between revisions
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
imported>Carlos Ferreira No edit summary |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
Cleaned up the article, regularized spelling and punctuation, etc. There are many terms used without any explanation. In most cases this is probably all right, but some in-line explanations of a few items would be helpful. Interesting! --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 12: | Cleaned up the article, regularized spelling and punctuation, etc. There are many terms used without any explanation. In most cases this is probably all right, but some in-line explanations of a few items would be helpful. Interesting! | ||
One other thing. I notice on Google that this plane is referred to as: | |||
# Fw-190 (as you have it) | |||
# FW-190 | |||
# FW 190 | |||
# Fw 190 | |||
We need to have a copyeditor type who gives a *&$@ figure out exactly which is "most correct." --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 12:29, 5 March 2008 (CST) | |||
Yeah, I realized that problem with the spelling. I have some bibliography somewhere around here, I'll see to it. --[[User:Carlos Ferreira|Carlos Ferreira]] 14:07, 5 March 2008 (CST) | |||
Well, I found my references, and the most reliable ones quote the FW 190. Aparently, the most reliable sources don't insert the hyphen. I'm goingo to delete all the hyphens in the text, but I can't edit the title, or can I?--[[User:Carlos Ferreira|Carlos Ferreira]] 17:39, 6 March 2008 (CST) |
Latest revision as of 17:39, 6 March 2008
Cleaned up the article, regularized spelling and punctuation, etc. There are many terms used without any explanation. In most cases this is probably all right, but some in-line explanations of a few items would be helpful. Interesting!
One other thing. I notice on Google that this plane is referred to as:
- Fw-190 (as you have it)
- FW-190
- FW 190
- Fw 190
We need to have a copyeditor type who gives a *&$@ figure out exactly which is "most correct." --Larry Sanger 12:29, 5 March 2008 (CST)
Yeah, I realized that problem with the spelling. I have some bibliography somewhere around here, I'll see to it. --Carlos Ferreira 14:07, 5 March 2008 (CST)
Well, I found my references, and the most reliable ones quote the FW 190. Aparently, the most reliable sources don't insert the hyphen. I'm goingo to delete all the hyphens in the text, but I can't edit the title, or can I?--Carlos Ferreira 17:39, 6 March 2008 (CST)