CZ:Proposals/Editorial Council

These are proposals that will go (or are now) before the Editorial Council.

Moving Forward on Obscenity

Summary: Our family-friendliness policy, as written, is unclear, and should be rewritten. Furthermore, we should move away from trying to self-censor, and work on setting CZ up so that schools, libraries and parents can filter content they find objectionable. Original proposer: Brian P. Long 07:25, 25 April 2008 (CDT) Next step: Get more feedback Driver: Brian P. Long To be done by: May 10 Notes: Also see 'Moving Forward on Obscenity', http://forum.citizendium.org/index.php/topic,1640.0.html on the forums for more discussion about this issue.

Complete proposal

Disambiguation mechanics

Summary: This proposal argues that all disambiguation pages should be at titles of the form "foo (disambiguation)", with a redirect at all basic names which are being disambiguated; this will allow us to easily find articles which have been linked (erroneously) to the wrong meaning of "{foo}". Original proposer: J. Noel Chiappa 09:33, 15 May 2008 (CDT) Next step: I would like to see debate on this to see what the community thinks of this; most people have been positive, but there might be some issues I haven't considered. Driver: J. Noel Chiappa To be done by: May 30th (approximately) Notes: A thread on the forums wandered into discussion of this topic here.

Complete proposal

Create a page for all notable genes in the human genome

Summary: We are interested in creating one page for all notable genes in the human genome. Each stub would be seeded using content which is harvested from publicly available sources. The resulting "Gene Wiki" would be a relatively unique resource compared to popular gene portals used by researchers and students. Given the expected number of created pages (5000-10000), an automated bot would be created/modified to perform the stub creation. Original proposer: Andrew Su 14:43, 16 April 2008 (CDT) Next step: Discussion by community Driver: Andrew Su To be done by: Complete in one month (May 15, 2008)? Notes: The proposal was originally discussed on the forum ([1]), so additional details and context can be found there.

Complete proposal

Self-Correction Policy

Summary: The Citizendium should adopt a policy that requires that we list all factual errors in previous versions of our articles--including unapproved articles--at the bottom of an article. This is the same standard that newspapers and other legitimate periodicals use. We are clearly obligated to adopt the same policy. Doing so will earn us good will from the public and increase our credibility considerably. Original proposer: Larry Sanger 08:57, 28 March 2008 (CDT) Next step: Submit to the Editorial Council for approval, hopefully by acclamation Driver: Larry Sanger To be done by: May 1 or when the Editorial Council comes back online

Complete proposal

Citing CZ article by authors

Summary: An author X, who wants to cite a Citizendium article he contributed to, should do so in a form like "Authors and X (2008) Life ..." (summary written by Proposals Manager) Original proposer: Lee R. Berger 01:44, 5 March 2008 (CST) Next step: Create Proposal Driver: Lee R. Berger 01:44, 5 March 2008 (CST) To be done by: 5 March

Complete proposal

Medical Disclaimers

Summary: Add a disclaimer to drug and medical condition pages Original proposer: David E. Volk 10:21, 9 March 2008 (CDT) Next step: Wait for new Editorial Council to be instated Driver: David E. Volk To be done by: April 7, 2008

Complete proposal

Pilot to allow Citizens to take credit for pages

Summary: By popular demand, we would, to a limited extent, allow Citizens to take authorship credit of articles. This would (for now) take the form of a template placed at the bottom of the page, which would, in small and unobtrusive print, list the contributors to an article in alphabetical order. Contributors would add themselves. To avoid issues about what counts as an "important" edit, a person could take co-authorship credit for adding at least two sentences, and five people who have to be on the list before any names were displayed. We would try this out in just four workgroups (the template would be removed from articles in any other workgroup). Original proposer: Larry Sanger 22:08, 12 February 2008 (CST) Next step: Submit to Editorial Council after new Council is empanelled Driver: Larry Sanger To be done by: May 1 or when the Editorial Council comes back online

Complete proposal

Create workgroup style guides

Summary: To promote coherent style and subsections within each workgroup, aid new users with examples of equations, drawings and other how-to items Original proposer: David E. Volk 11:33, 29 February 2008 (CST) Next step: Awaiting new Editorial Council vote Driver: User:David E. Volk To be done by: April 7, 2008 Notes: The idea is to have a workgroup-specific style guides to aid authors and editors for consistency

Complete proposal

Proposals System Navigation (advanced users only)

Help/policy New proposals List of all proposals Driverless proposals: proposals that lack a champion Discarded proposals: poorly formed proposals Templates: {{Proposal}} | {{Proposal assignment}} | {{Proposals navigation}}

Proposal lists (some planned pages are still blank): Editorial Council: Active | Finished | Declined Approval and Feedback: Active | Finished | Declined Eduzendium: Active | Finished | Declined Recruitment: Active | Finished | Declined Constabulary: Active | Finished | Declined Executive: Active | Finished | Declined Technical: Active | Finished | Declined PR: Active | Finished | Declined Ad hoc management: Active | Finished | Declined