Weakness of will: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Joe Quick
m (subpages)
imported>Thomas Ash
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
'''Weakness of will,''' or what philosophers often call by its ancient Greek name ''akrasia,'' describes actions that one takes even while personally believing, or knowing, them to be wrong.  The classic puzzle about weakness of will--which remains a puzzle for philosophers to this day--is whether it is possible really to ''know'' that an action is wrong and yet commit it.  Socrates is famous for, purportedly, holding the view that if one really ''knows'' a virtue, one will be virtuous in that way; and if one acts viciously, that is actually a sign of ignorance.  This is an intriguing view, but it seems to be contrary to common experience: we can, it seems, knowingly be "tempted" by illicit pleasures, or to avoid virtues that cause pain.
'''Weakness of will,''' which philosophers often call by its ancient Greek name ''akrasia,'' describes actions that one takes even while personally believing, or knowing, them to be wrong.  The classic puzzle about weakness of will--which remains a puzzle for philosophers to this day--is whether it is possible really to ''know'' that an action is wrong and yet commit it.  In the [[Meno]] and other dialogues by [[Plato]], [[Socrates]] claims that it is not, and so that acting contrary to virtue is a sign of ignorance.  Plato himself rejected this view, arguing that desires can sometimes overwhelm the intellectual recognition of what is right. Most contemporary philosophers follow him, claiming that we can knowingly be "tempted" by illicit pleasures, or to avoid virtues that cause pain.

Revision as of 04:00, 16 July 2008

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

Weakness of will, which philosophers often call by its ancient Greek name akrasia, describes actions that one takes even while personally believing, or knowing, them to be wrong. The classic puzzle about weakness of will--which remains a puzzle for philosophers to this day--is whether it is possible really to know that an action is wrong and yet commit it. In the Meno and other dialogues by Plato, Socrates claims that it is not, and so that acting contrary to virtue is a sign of ignorance. Plato himself rejected this view, arguing that desires can sometimes overwhelm the intellectual recognition of what is right. Most contemporary philosophers follow him, claiming that we can knowingly be "tempted" by illicit pleasures, or to avoid virtues that cause pain.