Pseudoscience/External Links: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Gareth Leng
(New page: There are many websites set up to air skeptical opinions particularly concerning claims for the effectiveness of remedies or treatments for a wide range of medical conditions which are not...)
 
imported>Gareth Leng
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:
* [http://www.randi.org/joom/content/view/130/2/ James Randi Educational Foundation]- "an educational resource on the paranormal, pseudoscientific, and the supernatural."
* [http://www.randi.org/joom/content/view/130/2/ James Randi Educational Foundation]- "an educational resource on the paranormal, pseudoscientific, and the supernatural."
* [http://www.astrosociety.org/education/resources/pseudobib.html Astronomical Pseudo-Science: A Skeptic's Resource List] "A selected list of resources for those who want to examine with a skeptical eye some of the claims at the fringes of science that seem connected to astronomy."
* [http://www.astrosociety.org/education/resources/pseudobib.html Astronomical Pseudo-Science: A Skeptic's Resource List] "A selected list of resources for those who want to examine with a skeptical eye some of the claims at the fringes of science that seem connected to astronomy."
* [http://rudolfhsmit.nl/index.html Astrology & Science
* [http://rudolfhsmit.nl/index.html Astrology & Science The Scientific Exploration of Astrology] "An archive of 69 articles with abstracts and references.  Results of hundreds of tests. Historical and philosophical views."
The Scientific Exploration of Astrology] "An archive of 69 articles with abstracts and references.  Results of hundreds of tests. Historical and philosophical views."

Revision as of 08:21, 28 November 2007

There are many websites set up to air skeptical opinions particularly concerning claims for the effectiveness of remedies or treatments for a wide range of medical conditions which are not endorsed by conventional medicine, and to criticise unconventional "fringe" theories that are not generally accepted. The standard of these sites (and the standards of arguments within them) vary considerably, and it would be a mistake to assume that these always present the fringe theories fairly, or the scientific arguments (for or against) rigorously. Among these sites are: