Talk:Born-Oppenheimer approximation: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Paul Wormer
No edit summary
 
imported>Paul Wormer
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{checklist
{{subpages}}
|                abc = Born-Oppenheimer approximation
|                cat1 = physics
|                cat2 =
|                cat3 =
|          cat_check =
|              status = 4
|        underlinked = yes
|            cleanup =
|                  by = --[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 07:13, 5 September 2007 (CDT)
}}


I wrote this WP article. --[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 07:13, 5 September 2007 (CDT)
{{WPimport}}
 
The corresponding article on WP is 100% mine. I consider this to be a good article, because, quite coincidentally, a prominent professor of theoretical chemistry told me that WP has many good articles. As an example he quoted this article, which he had used—as he told me—as a basis for a graduate seminar. So  I feel bad about the present status of 4; status 1 or 0, would be more appropriate. --[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 10:09, 26 October 2007 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 09:09, 26 October 2007

This article is developing and not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  A technique in quantum mechanics in which the kinetic energies of nuclei and electrons are calculated separately. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories:  Physics, Chemistry and Mathematics [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  British English
Fountain pen.jpg
 NOTICE, please do not remove from top of page.
I worked on this article on Wikipedia, and intend to maintain and develop it on the Citizendium.
Check the history of edits to see who inserted this notice.

The corresponding article on WP is 100% mine. I consider this to be a good article, because, quite coincidentally, a prominent professor of theoretical chemistry told me that WP has many good articles. As an example he quoted this article, which he had used—as he told me—as a basis for a graduate seminar. So I feel bad about the present status of 4; status 1 or 0, would be more appropriate. --Paul Wormer 10:09, 26 October 2007 (CDT)

Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Born-Oppenheimer_approximation&oldid=32968"