Talk:Historic theaters of California

Article Checklist for "Historic theaters of California"

Workgroup category or categories	Visual Arts Workgroup, History Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status	Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article?	Yes
Basic cleanup done?	No
Checklist last edited by	--Todd Coles 15:51, 3 August 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.

---

move

Perhaps this article would be better placed at California, Historic theaters or something similar. Most of our other articles seem to follow that format. --Todd Coles 15:53, 3 August 2007 (CDT)

Actually, a catalog of California theaters would belong on California theater/Catalogs/Historic theaters. Since we have instigated CZ:Subpages officially, catalogs should appear only on subpages. --Larry Sanger 10:03, 18 September 2007 (CDT)

Also, I disagree with Todd's point about the use of the comma in this sort of case. History editor Richard Jensen uses commas in history articles; but before too much longer we'll be taking a Council vote on this (actually, a question we might vote on first is whether the History Workgroup can set its own policy on such issues). --Larry Sanger 10:06, 18 September 2007 (CDT)

historic significance

Could you make a case that these theatres had a historic significance in the development of Cali's hollywood dominance, and certainly a major contributing factor to their demographics since its inception.. I wouldn't be so quick to dismiss history as a category. --Robert W King 01:37, 8 October 2007 (CDT)