Talk:Cargo cult: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger
No edit summary
imported>John Stephenson
(Religions)
Line 16: Line 16:


is just egregious.  Who argues that?  Why not name that person or those people?  Stated the way it is, it looks merely like a biased remark against mainstream religions, which (goes the implication) have no more credibility or legitimacy than cargo cults. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 08:30, 17 July 2007 (CDT)
is just egregious.  Who argues that?  Why not name that person or those people?  Stated the way it is, it looks merely like a biased remark against mainstream religions, which (goes the implication) have no more credibility or legitimacy than cargo cults. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 08:30, 17 July 2007 (CDT)
:Richard Dawkins - as I referenced with that sentence. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 08:36, 17 July 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 07:36, 17 July 2007


Article Checklist for "Cargo cult"
Workgroup category or categories Anthropology Workgroup, Religion Workgroup, Media Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? No
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by John Stephenson 08:08, 17 July 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





Just a quick throw-away comment here. I know this is taken from Wikipedia and therefore to be expected, but this sentence

The rapid rise of cargo cults is argued to be a possible account of how mainstream religions get started.

is just egregious. Who argues that? Why not name that person or those people? Stated the way it is, it looks merely like a biased remark against mainstream religions, which (goes the implication) have no more credibility or legitimacy than cargo cults. --Larry Sanger 08:30, 17 July 2007 (CDT)

Richard Dawkins - as I referenced with that sentence. John Stephenson 08:36, 17 July 2007 (CDT)