Talk:APFA Bhutan: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Thomas Fontanari
(Still far from neutral)
imported>Larry Sanger
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
''Please sign all your comments on this page.''
This article is not written from a neutral perspective, but, it seems, rather an advertising piece by the organization itself or someone affiliated with it.
This article is not written from a neutral perspective, but, it seems, rather an advertising piece by the organization itself or someone affiliated with it.


Line 4: Line 6:


'''''We''' believe that press is one of the major components to demonstrate the extent of democratization of a country. It also explains the extents of people's participation in governance. '''We''' believe, it is must for a free and democratic society. Press also alerts government to comply on its responsibilities and obligations. That is why it has been very often referred to as the fourth state of a country.''
'''''We''' believe that press is one of the major components to demonstrate the extent of democratization of a country. It also explains the extents of people's participation in governance. '''We''' believe, it is must for a free and democratic society. Press also alerts government to comply on its responsibilities and obligations. That is why it has been very often referred to as the fourth state of a country.''
--[[User:Thomas Fontanari]]


== Still far from neutral ==
== Still far from neutral ==
Line 9: Line 13:
Despite the removal of most sentences containing the first person (not all: ''The radio program can be listened live on '''our''' site or at nepalfnnetwork.com, the website of the radio station.''), this is still an article far from neutral and concise.
Despite the removal of most sentences containing the first person (not all: ''The radio program can be listened live on '''our''' site or at nepalfnnetwork.com, the website of the radio station.''), this is still an article far from neutral and concise.


What reminds me unpleasantly of wikipedia ist that the author does not engage in discussion about his piece and doesn't even give his edits a headline.
What reminds me unpleasantly of wikipedia ist that the author does not engage in discussion about his piece and doesn't even give his edits a headline. --[[User:Thomas Fontanari]]

Revision as of 07:52, 10 July 2007

Please sign all your comments on this page.

This article is not written from a neutral perspective, but, it seems, rather an advertising piece by the organization itself or someone affiliated with it.

Article even uses first person:

We believe that press is one of the major components to demonstrate the extent of democratization of a country. It also explains the extents of people's participation in governance. We believe, it is must for a free and democratic society. Press also alerts government to comply on its responsibilities and obligations. That is why it has been very often referred to as the fourth state of a country.

--User:Thomas Fontanari

Still far from neutral

Despite the removal of most sentences containing the first person (not all: The radio program can be listened live on our site or at nepalfnnetwork.com, the website of the radio station.), this is still an article far from neutral and concise.

What reminds me unpleasantly of wikipedia ist that the author does not engage in discussion about his piece and doesn't even give his edits a headline. --User:Thomas Fontanari