Talk:Chips (food): Difference between revisions
imported>Martin Baldwin-Edwards No edit summary |
imported>Hayford Peirce m (Talk:Chip (food) moved to Talk:Chips (food): Everyone also says Fish and Chips; also Fries; also the Catalog of British cuisine now lists Chips, not Chip) |
Revision as of 22:10, 1 August 2007
Workgroup category or categories | Food Science Workgroup, Health Sciences Workgroup [Categories OK] |
Article status | Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete |
Underlinked article? | No |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | John Stephenson 05:26, 14 June 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
Drooping?
"[Chips]... are very similar to French fries, the distinction being that fries are much thinner and may droop. A chip, by contrast, will always remain straight even when a little pressure is applied."
Surely the other way around? A cardboardy fry could be used to jab someone in the eye after being cooked; by contrast, a thicker chip tends to be softer and therefore more liable to drooping. Stand on a dropped fry and it might puncture your shoe - whereas a chip gets mashed into your sole. Anton Sweeney 18:24, 14 June 2007 (CDT)
- As a fairly experienced cook, I think the key element here is how *long* the individual item has been cooked. A skinny little french fry can be overcooked until it's like a stick. And obviously if you take an Idaho potato and cut it into, say, 4 lengthwise pieces, each piece is gonna be so thick that it will *never* droop. But otherwise I think you're right in one sense: I think this "droop" business should be eliminated. It's clearly one of those things where it's sometimes this, sometimes that....
- Particularly if french fries are cooked in two batches: sometimes the 95% cooked fries are put back into hot oil and allowed to overcook -- it can only be a couple of seconds too many but they mostly ruined.... Hayford Peirce 18:30, 14 June 2007 (CDT)
- I have reluctantly removed the bit about droopy French fries. Clearly, some droop and others don't. John Stephenson 23:56, 14 June 2007 (CDT)
Nomenclature
Chips are indeed a bit heartier in the UK, and the 'pommefritz' you can buy from street vendors in Berlin are even better! But despite this, it seems to me that "chip" (UK) = "french fry" or "fries" (US) (just as Potato Chip in the US = Crisp in the UK). Russell Potter 18:47, 14 June 2007 (CDT)
- that's to say,. I do not think a "chip" is a fundamentally different thing from fries or pommefritz. Russell Potter 09:03, 15 June 2007 (CDT)
Chips photos
See Talk:French fries; I have uploaded some chips to French fries as well as this page so sceptics can compare the two. John Stephenson 02:54, 16 June 2007 (CDT)
- A casual reader from Mars, etc, might conclude from your pic of the chippy that they have very few customers! It might be an idea to have a pic which shows the social context, as this is mentioned in the article. --Martin Baldwin-Edwards 08:20, 16 June 2007 (CDT)
- Food Science Category Check
- General Category Check
- Health Sciences Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Food Science Advanced Articles
- Food Science Nonstub Articles
- Food Science Internal Articles
- Health Sciences Advanced Articles
- Health Sciences Nonstub Articles
- Health Sciences Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Food Science Developed Articles
- Health Sciences Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Food Science Developing Articles
- Health Sciences Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Food Science Stub Articles
- Health Sciences Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Food Science External Articles
- Health Sciences External Articles
- Food Science Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Health Sciences Underlinked Articles
- Food Science Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Health Sciences Cleanup
- Cleanup