Talk:Cogito ergo sum: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>David Yamakuchi No edit summary |
imported>David Yamakuchi No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
Unfortunately ''I think, therefore I am'' reveals a rather counterproductive aspect of radical skepticism. Part of the conclusion reached is that one can only be ''absolotely certain'' of one's own existance. Everything else in the universe is suspect. It makes it rather difficult to state anything at all as a "fact". You just can't be certain. | Unfortunately ''I think, therefore I am'' reveals a rather counterproductive aspect of radical skepticism. Part of the conclusion reached is that one can only be ''absolotely certain'' of one's own existance. Everything else in the universe is suspect. It makes it rather difficult to state anything at all as a "fact". You just can't be certain. It might be important to mention this in the article... --[[User:David Yamakuchi|David Yamakuchi]] 22:26, 30 December 2007 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 22:26, 30 December 2007
Unfortunately I think, therefore I am reveals a rather counterproductive aspect of radical skepticism. Part of the conclusion reached is that one can only be absolotely certain of one's own existance. Everything else in the universe is suspect. It makes it rather difficult to state anything at all as a "fact". You just can't be certain. It might be important to mention this in the article... --David Yamakuchi 22:26, 30 December 2007 (CST)