Talk:Compiler: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Pat Palmer
(do we need history of compilers? and a bit about references)
imported>Jitse Niesen
(remove maths workgroup and catcheck flag from checklist)
Line 2: Line 2:
|                abc = Compiler
|                abc = Compiler
|                cat1 = Computers
|                cat1 = Computers
|                cat2 = Mathematics
|                cat2 =  
|                cat3 =  
|                cat3 =  
|          cat_check = y
|          cat_check = n
|              status = 2
|              status = 2
|        underlinked = y
|        underlinked = y
|            cleanup = y
|            cleanup = y
|                  by = [[User:Pat Palmer|Pat Palmer]] 03:22, 9 May 2007 (CDT)
|                  by = [[User:Jitse Niesen|Jitse Niesen]] 00:13, 11 September 2007 (CDT)
}}
}}



Revision as of 23:13, 10 September 2007


Article Checklist for "Compiler"
Workgroup category or categories Computers Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Jitse Niesen 00:13, 11 September 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





note on article split

I have split this article away from translation system.Pat Palmer 03:22, 9 May 2007 (CDT)

shall we merge in Optimization for now?

Optimization_(computer_science) seems like it really ought to be merged back into compiler, at least for now, since it is just a stub. We could always split them again if both get too large. As it stands, though, we run the risk of getting duplication information in two articles if they are kept separate.Pat Palmer 03:45, 9 May 2007 (CDT)

we need a section (or an article?) on history of compilers

The first compiler was such a breakthough. Assemblers and compilers used to be difficult. Nowadays, they are much better understood (but the formalisms behind them were not always so well understood). There's a story there.Pat Palmer 04:21, 9 May 2007 (CDT)

we need references

Does anyone have the Aho/Ullman book around (or whatever people are reading these days instead)? If so, the article would benefit it we could cite it (and some others) as references for specific parts of this article.Pat Palmer 04:21, 9 May 2007 (CDT)