Talk:Compiler: Difference between revisions
imported>Pat Palmer (do we need history of compilers? and a bit about references) |
imported>Jitse Niesen (remove maths workgroup and catcheck flag from checklist) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| abc = Compiler | | abc = Compiler | ||
| cat1 = Computers | | cat1 = Computers | ||
| cat2 = | | cat2 = | ||
| cat3 = | | cat3 = | ||
| cat_check = | | cat_check = n | ||
| status = 2 | | status = 2 | ||
| underlinked = y | | underlinked = y | ||
| cleanup = y | | cleanup = y | ||
| by = [[User: | | by = [[User:Jitse Niesen|Jitse Niesen]] 00:13, 11 September 2007 (CDT) | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 23:13, 10 September 2007
Workgroup category or categories | Computers Workgroup [Categories OK] |
Article status | Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete |
Underlinked article? | Yes |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | Jitse Niesen 00:13, 11 September 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
note on article split
I have split this article away from translation system.Pat Palmer 03:22, 9 May 2007 (CDT)
shall we merge in Optimization for now?
Optimization_(computer_science) seems like it really ought to be merged back into compiler, at least for now, since it is just a stub. We could always split them again if both get too large. As it stands, though, we run the risk of getting duplication information in two articles if they are kept separate.Pat Palmer 03:45, 9 May 2007 (CDT)
we need a section (or an article?) on history of compilers
The first compiler was such a breakthough. Assemblers and compilers used to be difficult. Nowadays, they are much better understood (but the formalisms behind them were not always so well understood). There's a story there.Pat Palmer 04:21, 9 May 2007 (CDT)
we need references
Does anyone have the Aho/Ullman book around (or whatever people are reading these days instead)? If so, the article would benefit it we could cite it (and some others) as references for specific parts of this article.Pat Palmer 04:21, 9 May 2007 (CDT)
- Computers Category Check
- General Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Computers Advanced Articles
- Computers Nonstub Articles
- Computers Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Computers Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Computers Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Computers Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Computers External Articles
- Computers Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Computers Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Cleanup