Talk:Gospel of Thomas: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Russell Potter
mNo edit summary
imported>Derek Harkness
(Article checklist)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{checklist
|                abc = Gospel of Thomas
|                cat1 = Religion
|                cat2 =
|                cat3 =
|          cat_check = n
|              status = 3
|        underlinked = y
|            cleanup = y
|                  by = [[User:Derek Harkness|Derek Harkness]] 02:03, 6 June 2007 (CDT)
}}
This is just a start for an entirely new entry -- it is heavily adapted from a version which, some time ago, I wrote for the (since greatly discredited) Conservapedia under the pseudonym "Boethius", but I hope it can find a far more congenial home here. [[User:Russell Potter|Russell Potter]] 21:02, 29 April 2007 (CDT)
This is just a start for an entirely new entry -- it is heavily adapted from a version which, some time ago, I wrote for the (since greatly discredited) Conservapedia under the pseudonym "Boethius", but I hope it can find a far more congenial home here. [[User:Russell Potter|Russell Potter]] 21:02, 29 April 2007 (CDT)



Revision as of 01:03, 6 June 2007


Article Checklist for "Gospel of Thomas"
Workgroup category or categories Religion Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Stub: no more than a few sentences
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Derek Harkness 02:03, 6 June 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





This is just a start for an entirely new entry -- it is heavily adapted from a version which, some time ago, I wrote for the (since greatly discredited) Conservapedia under the pseudonym "Boethius", but I hope it can find a far more congenial home here. Russell Potter 21:02, 29 April 2007 (CDT)

How about a link to the text? --Larry Sanger 13:20, 4 June 2007 (CDT)
Would be great, to do, but the only online "translations" I know of are at least loosely based on the copyrighted edition. I'll look about anew. Russell Potter 14:17, 4 June 2007 (CDT)
I believe you might be thinking of the Gospel of Judas where the copyrighted version has generated some controversy. I have added a link to the "Early Christian Writings" web site section on Thomas which has a wealth of on-line material on the Gospel of Thomas. James F. Perry 18:44, 4 June 2007 (CDT)
No, actually -- though I have copies of nearly all the Gnostic gospels in various editions -- but thanks for the link, this looks like an independent translation, just what we needed! What I had meant earlier was sites such as this one, which is largely a paraphrase of translation given in the Harper & Row hardcover edition of 1959. Russell Potter 22:41, 4 June 2007 (CDT)