Talk:Oral History: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Thomas E Kelly
No edit summary
 
imported>Richard Jensen
(oral medicine)
Line 1: Line 1:
Does oral history in relation to medicine get a mention? --even though it really is another article. [[User:Thomas E Kelly|-Tom Kelly]] [[User talk:Thomas E Kelly|(Talk)]] 21:59, 10 April 2007 (CDT)
Does oral history in relation to medicine get a mention? --even though it really is another article. [[User:Thomas E Kelly|-Tom Kelly]] [[User talk:Thomas E Kelly|(Talk)]] 21:59, 10 April 2007 (CDT)
::do you mean doctors interviewing patients? or historians interviewing doctors (the latter will get covered if I spot an article)--as in Ophthalmology Oral History Series (reviewed in Bulletin of the History of Medicine 1996 70(1): 167.) I'll add Tomes. [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 00:42, 11 April 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 23:42, 10 April 2007

Does oral history in relation to medicine get a mention? --even though it really is another article. -Tom Kelly (Talk) 21:59, 10 April 2007 (CDT)

do you mean doctors interviewing patients? or historians interviewing doctors (the latter will get covered if I spot an article)--as in Ophthalmology Oral History Series (reviewed in Bulletin of the History of Medicine 1996 70(1): 167.) I'll add Tomes. Richard Jensen 00:42, 11 April 2007 (CDT)