Cantor's diagonal argument: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Greg Woodhouse
(ref. to halting problem)
imported>Sébastien Moulin
m (categories)
Line 10: Line 10:


It follows that <math>\psi \not= \phi_i </math> for any <math>i</math>, and it must therefore correspond to a set not in the range of <math>\Psi</math>. This contradiction shows that <math>2^{\mathbb{N}}</math> cannot be countable.
It follows that <math>\psi \not= \phi_i </math> for any <math>i</math>, and it must therefore correspond to a set not in the range of <math>\Psi</math>. This contradiction shows that <math>2^{\mathbb{N}}</math> cannot be countable.
[[Category:CZ Live]]
[[Category:Mathematics Workgroup]]

Revision as of 10:57, 30 March 2007

Cantor's diagonal method provides a convenient proof that the set of subsets of the natural numbers (also known as its power set is not countable. More generally, it is a recurring theme in computability theory, where perhaps its most well known application is the negative solution halting problem.

The Argument

To any set we may associate a function by setting if and , otherwise. Conversely, every such function defines a subset.

If power set is countable, there is a bijective map , that allows us to assign an index to every subset S. Assuming this has been done, we proceed to construct a function such that the corresponding set, cannot be in the range of .

For each , either or , and so we may simply such that .

It follows that for any , and it must therefore correspond to a set not in the range of . This contradiction shows that cannot be countable.