Talk:Renaissance: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Anthony Argyriou (this is still a stub, not a developing article) |
imported>Anthony Argyriou (comment a(and sign old comment)) |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Hi Everyone! | Hi Everyone! | ||
I have started this page! Please feel free to add to it. Please reference all of your sources. Cheers! :) | I have started this page! Please feel free to add to it. Please reference all of your sources. Cheers! :){{unsigned2| 17:15, 29 March 2007|Matthew Harward}} | ||
Thanks for starting this. Maybe we should make the title Renaissance (European) ? Anyway, I stated that focus in the introduction. [[User:Nancy Sculerati|Nancy Sculerati]] 20:27, 29 March 2007 (CDT) | Thanks for starting this. Maybe we should make the title Renaissance (European) ? Anyway, I stated that focus in the introduction. [[User:Nancy Sculerati|Nancy Sculerati]] 20:27, 29 March 2007 (CDT) | ||
I've downgraded this to a stub. There's enough of an outline that can be built on to create a good article, so it's not really a candidate for deletion, but it hasn't developed in a while. [[User:Anthony Argyriou|Anthony Argyriou]] 13:27, 26 July 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 12:27, 26 July 2007
Workgroup category or categories | History Workgroup [Categories OK] |
Article status | Stub: no more than a few sentences |
Underlinked article? | No |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | Anthony Argyriou 13:25, 26 July 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
Hi Everyone! I have started this page! Please feel free to add to it. Please reference all of your sources. Cheers! :)—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Matthew Harward (talk • contribs) 17:15, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for starting this. Maybe we should make the title Renaissance (European) ? Anyway, I stated that focus in the introduction. Nancy Sculerati 20:27, 29 March 2007 (CDT)
I've downgraded this to a stub. There's enough of an outline that can be built on to create a good article, so it's not really a candidate for deletion, but it hasn't developed in a while. Anthony Argyriou 13:27, 26 July 2007 (CDT)
Categories:
- History Category Check
- General Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- History Advanced Articles
- History Nonstub Articles
- History Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- History Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- History Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- History Stub Articles
- External Articles
- History External Articles
- History Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- History Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Cleanup