Education: Difference between revisions
imported>Tom Morris No edit summary |
imported>Tom Morris No edit summary |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Education can also be for perhaps less savory purposes: political or religious [[indoctrination]]. The power of educational institutions to influence people's minds has been used by cults and by totalitarian states to push their ideology and beliefs without any question. | Education can also be for perhaps less savory purposes: political or religious [[indoctrination]]. The power of educational institutions to influence people's minds has been used by cults and by totalitarian states to push their ideology and beliefs without any question. | ||
== Psychology in education == | |||
To help make the process of education more optimal, psychologists, sociologists and other social sciences have attempted to understand the process that people go through when learning, and to apply those insights in schools and universities, when training teachers and writing textbooks. Psychologists like [[Lawrence Kohlberg]] and [[Jean Piaget]] have put forward theories of how children develop through a variety of stages. | |||
It is widely recognised that people often have wide differences in how they learn - what some teachers and psychologists call ''style'' of learning<ref>See Richard Felder and Linda Silverman's [http://www4.ncsu.edu/unity/lockers/users/f/felder/public/ILSpage.html Index of Learning Styles].</ref>. Some will find that they are 'visual-spatial' learners, and find learning easier if ideas are represented through graphics or images. 'Sensory' learners tend to need to feel involved in learning - physical learning tools like toys and games are oten used to help those who learn in this manner. Others tend to learn better through audio-visual presentations. The variety of different learning styles has forced teachers to be more flexible in how they teach. | |||
Other areas of interest for psychologists studying education include motivation and learning goals, the inhibitors to people studying including procrastination, anti-intellectual peer groups, class size and school size. | |||
== Contemporary debates in education == | == Contemporary debates in education == |
Revision as of 05:39, 3 September 2008
Education is a term that can refer to both the act of learning and the skills and knowledge gained through the process of learning. Education can be divided into two main varieties: formal education and informal education.
Formal education is organized teaching and training; it is the application of pedagogy, a body of theoretical and applied research relating to teaching and learning. This is usually done through schools, universities, colleges and other institutions. Such institutions will measure educational attainment through a process of examinations, often leading to qualifications and degrees.
The term informal education may be used to refer all learning that occurs outside the context of a formal educational program. Those who teach get the sort of education traditionally associated with schools and universities under their own direction are called autodidacts. There are many who choose not to send their children to schools, instead giving them a homeschool education, or sometimes even a very non-traditional education through unschooling.
The reasons given for getting an education or requiring that others are educated are plentiful. Learning skills can be vital for certain types of employment, and even education in the humanities is often done for the reason that it demonstrates a mental agility, an ability to creatively solve problems that many in the business world find attractive. Many people learn for learning's sake: because a subject is interesting even if it has no practical or commercial application. Socities often require that a child be given an education to prepare him for citizenship and for employment. Education can be a public benefit in as much as it prevents people from engaging in destructive acts.
Education can also be for perhaps less savory purposes: political or religious indoctrination. The power of educational institutions to influence people's minds has been used by cults and by totalitarian states to push their ideology and beliefs without any question.
Psychology in education
To help make the process of education more optimal, psychologists, sociologists and other social sciences have attempted to understand the process that people go through when learning, and to apply those insights in schools and universities, when training teachers and writing textbooks. Psychologists like Lawrence Kohlberg and Jean Piaget have put forward theories of how children develop through a variety of stages.
It is widely recognised that people often have wide differences in how they learn - what some teachers and psychologists call style of learning[1]. Some will find that they are 'visual-spatial' learners, and find learning easier if ideas are represented through graphics or images. 'Sensory' learners tend to need to feel involved in learning - physical learning tools like toys and games are oten used to help those who learn in this manner. Others tend to learn better through audio-visual presentations. The variety of different learning styles has forced teachers to be more flexible in how they teach.
Other areas of interest for psychologists studying education include motivation and learning goals, the inhibitors to people studying including procrastination, anti-intellectual peer groups, class size and school size.
Contemporary debates in education
Because of the wide-ranging effects of education and schooling, debates about the best way to educate are often some of the thorniest political issues.
One issue where conflict has arisen is curriculum - what is taught in schools. Political groups often lobby for their particular ideas to be given classroom time: whether that means creationism or intelligent design, comparative religion compared to specific religious instruction, abstinence-only sex education, which parts of history to emphasise or some forms of political correctness. Moral issues like sex, drug abuse and relationships are often of concern for parents.
There has been debate over the value of vocational education, with schools now offering work-based training courses in addition to academic teaching. In the United Kingdom, there is the fear that vocational education is not widely respected or understood, and calls on the government to ensure parity between academic and vocational education. Some politicians have even questioned the value of "education for it's own sake" - former British Education Secretary Charles Clarke one stated that study of the classics - and, by extension, other arts subjects - was "a bit dodgy" and that students "need a relationship with the workplace"[2]. Only a few years later, and companies like McDonald's, train operator Network Rail and airline Flybe have been awarded the ability to grant qualifications[3][4][5], and the British government is planning to roll out a new 'diploma' system which would have academic and vocational qualifications declared equals.
Another debate that has come to fore in the United States, mostly during the administration of Bill Clinton, is that of uniforms[6][7]. Studies have been conducted into whether or not uniforms reduce gangs, bullying and fashion, while others argue that mandatory uniform or dress code requirements intefere with the free speech rights of pupils.
References
- ↑ See Richard Felder and Linda Silverman's Index of Learning Styles.
- ↑ BBC News, Clarke criticised over classics, 31 January, 2003
- ↑ BBC News, McDonald's serves up 'Diplomas', January 28, 2008
- ↑ BBC News, McDonald's 'A-level' is launched, January 27, 2008
- ↑ BBC News, Q&A: What are McDiplomas?
- ↑ U.S. Department of Education, Creating Safe and Drug-Free Schools: An Action Guide, September 1996
- ↑ PBS, School Uniforms